Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27313512›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2016

E2 Regulates Epigenetic Signature on Neuroglobin Enhancer-Promoter in Neuronal Cells.

Michela Guglielmotto, Stefania Reineri, Andrea Iannello, Giulio Ferrero, Ludovica Vanzan, Valentina Miano, Laura Ricci, Elena Tamagno, Michele De Bortoli, Santina Cutrupi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Neuroglobin: A New Player in the Gut-Brain Axis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Neuroglobin Expression Models as a Tool to Study Its Function.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2019
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Outlook on the neuroprotective effect of estrogen.Neural regeneration research · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michela GuglielmottoNeuroscience Institute of the Cavalieri Ottolenghi Foundation (NICO), University of TurinTurin, Italy; Department Neurosciences, University of TurinTurin, Italy.
Stefania ReineriCenter for Molecular Systems Biology, University of TurinOrbassano, Turin, Italy; Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of TurinOrbassano, Turin, Italy.
Andrea IannelloCenter for Molecular Systems Biology, University of TurinOrbassano, Turin, Italy; Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of TurinOrbassano, Turin, Italy.
Giulio FerreroCenter for Molecular Systems Biology, University of TurinOrbassano, Turin, Italy; Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of TurinOrbassano, Turin, Italy; Department of Computer Science, University of TurinTurin, Italy.
Ludovica VanzanCenter for Molecular Systems Biology, University of Turin Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
Valentina MianoCenter for Molecular Systems Biology, University of TurinOrbassano, Turin, Italy; Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of TurinOrbassano, Turin, Italy.
Laura RicciCenter for Molecular Systems Biology, University of TurinOrbassano, Turin, Italy; Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of TurinOrbassano, Turin, Italy.
Elena TamagnoNeuroscience Institute of the Cavalieri Ottolenghi Foundation (NICO), University of TurinTurin, Italy; Department Neurosciences, University of TurinTurin, Italy.
Michele De BortoliCenter for Molecular Systems Biology, University of TurinOrbassano, Turin, Italy; Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of TurinOrbassano, Turin, Italy.
Santina CutrupiCenter for Molecular Systems Biology, University of TurinOrbassano, Turin, Italy; Department of Clinical and Biological Sciences, University of TurinOrbassano, Turin, Italy.
University of Turin · ITNeuroscience Institute · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estrogens are neuroprotective factors in several neurological diseases. Neuroglobin (NGB) is one of the estrogen target genes involved in neuroprotection, but little is known about its transcriptional regulation. Estrogen genomic pathway in gene expression regulation is mediated by estrogen receptors (ERα and ERβ) that bind to specific regulatory genomic regions. We focused our attention on 17β-estradiol (E2)-induced NGB expression in human differentiated neuronal cell lines (SK-N-BE and NT-2). Previously, using bioinformatics analysis we identified a putative enhancer in the first intron of NGB locus. Therefore, we observed that E2 increased the enrichment of the H3K4me3 epigenetic marks at the promoter and of the H3K4me1 and H3K27Ac at the intron enhancer. In these NGB regulatory regions, we found estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) binding suggesting that ERα may mediate chromatin remodeling to induce NGB expression upon E2 treatment. Altogether our data show that NGB expression is regulated by ERα binding on genomic regulatory regions supporting hormone therapy applications for the neuroprotection against neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

chromatin remodelingepigenetic regulationestrogen receptorgenomic regionsneuroglobin

Identifiers

PMID27313512
PMCPMC4887468
OpenAlexW2412693891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.