Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27313506›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2016

Brain Bases of Working Memory for Time Intervals in Rhythmic Sequences.

Sundeep Teki, Timothy D Griffiths

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The hearing hippocampus.Progress in neurobiology · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Double dissociation of single-interval and rhythmic temporal prediction in cerebellar degeneration and Parkinson's disease.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Rhesus Monkeys (Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  19. The Persistence of Memory: How the Brain Encodes Time in Memory.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2017
    Article
  20. Music Perception in Dementia.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sundeep TekiWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London London, UK.
Timothy D GriffithsWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College LondonLondon, UK; Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle UniversityNewcastle upon Tyne, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 091593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perception of auditory time intervals is critical for accurate comprehension of natural sounds like speech and music. However, the neural substrates and mechanisms underlying the representation of time intervals in working memory are poorly understood. In this study, we investigate the brain bases of working memory for time intervals in rhythmic sequences using functional magnetic resonance imaging. We used a novel behavioral paradigm to investigate time-interval representation in working memory as a function of the temporal jitter and memory load of the sequences containing those time intervals. Human participants were presented with a sequence of intervals and required to reproduce the duration of a particular probed interval. We found that perceptual timing areas including the cerebellum and the striatum were more or less active as a function of increasing and decreasing jitter of the intervals held in working memory respectively whilst the activity of the inferior parietal cortex is modulated as a function of memory load. Additionally, we also analyzed structural correlations between gray and white matter density and behavior and found significant correlations in the cerebellum and the striatum, mirroring the functional results. Our data demonstrate neural substrates of working memory for time intervals and suggest that the cerebellum and the striatum represent core areas for representing temporal information in working memory.

Indexed as

fMRIinterval timingrhythmtime perceptionworking memory

Identifiers

PMID27313506
PMCPMC4888525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.