Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27313456›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2016

Bone regenerating effect of surface-functionalized titanium implants with sustained-release characteristics of strontium in ovariectomized rats.

Vincent Offermanns, Ole Zoffmann Andersen, Gregor Riede, Inge Hald Andersen, Klaus Pagh Almtoft, Søren Sørensen, Michael Sillassen, Christian Sloth Jeppesen, Michael Rasse, Morten Foss and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Vincent OffermannsDepartment of Cranio-, Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Ole Zoffmann AndersenInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Gregor RiedeDepartment of Cranio-, Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Inge Hald AndersenTribology Centre, Danish Technological Institute, Aarhus, Denmark.
Klaus Pagh AlmtoftTribology Centre, Danish Technological Institute, Aarhus, Denmark.
Søren SørensenTribology Centre, Danish Technological Institute, Aarhus, Denmark.
Michael SillassenInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Christian Sloth JeppesenTribology Centre, Danish Technological Institute, Aarhus, Denmark.
Michael RasseDepartment of Cranio-, Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Morten FossInterdisciplinary Nanoscience Center (iNANO), Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Frank KlossDepartment of Cranio-, Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Innsbruck Medical University · ATAarhus University · DKDanish Technological Institute · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since strontium (Sr) is known for its anabolic and anticatabolic effect on bone, research has been focused on its potential impact on osseointegration. The objective of this study was to investigate the performance of nanotopographic implants with a Sr-functionalized titanium (Ti) coating (Ti-Sr-O) with respect to osseointegration in osteoporotic bone. The trial was designed to examine the effect of sustained-release characteristics of Sr in poor-quality bone. Three Ti-Sr-O groups, which differed from each other in coating thickness, Sr contents, and Sr release, were examined. These were prepared by a magnetron sputtering process and compared to uncoated grade 4 Ti. Composition, morphology, and mechanical stability of the coatings were analyzed, and Sr release data were gained from in vitro washout experiments. In vivo investigation was carried out in an osteoporotic rat model and analyzed histologically, 6 weeks and 12 weeks after implantation. Median values of bone-to-implant contact and new bone formation after 6 weeks were found to be 84.7% and 54.9% (best performing Sr group) as compared to 65.2% and 23.8% (grade 4 Ti reference), respectively. The 12-week observation period revealed 84.3% and 56.5% (best performing Sr group) and 81.3% and 39.4% (grade 4 Ti reference), respectively, for the same measurements. The increase in new bone formation was found to correlate with the amount of Sr released in vitro. The results indicate that sputtered nanostructured Ti-Sr-O coatings showed sustained release of Sr and accelerate osseointegration even in poor-quality bone, and thus, may have impact on practical applications for medical implants.

Indexed as

Bone-Implant InterfaceProstheses and ImplantsAnimalsCoated Materials, BiocompatibleDelayed-Action PreparationsFemaleNanostructuresOsseointegrationOvariectomyRats, WistarStrontiumSurface PropertiesTitaniumCoated Materials, BiocompatibleDelayed-Action PreparationsStrontiumTitaniumnanotopographyosseointegrationosteoinductionosteoporosisrodent

Identifiers

PMID27313456
PMCPMC4892864
OpenAlexW2417072155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.