Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27313212›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Cell type-specific control of protein synthesis and proliferation by FGF-dependent signaling to the translation repressor 4E-BP.

Rachel Ruoff, Olga Katsara, Victoria Kolupaeva

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Ribosome dysfunction in osteoarthritis.Current opinion in rheumatology · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Serine-threonine protein phosphatases: Lost in translation.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular cell research · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachel RuoffDepartment of Microbiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016.
Olga KatsaraDepartment of Microbiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016.
Victoria KolupaevaDepartment of Microbiology, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY 10016 kolupv01@nyumc.org.
NYU Langone Health · US

Funding

Translational Control in Cartilage Biology. - Resubmission - 1R01AR063128 · NIAMS · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI KOLUPAEVA, VICTORIA · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR063128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regulation of protein synthesis plays a vital role in posttranscriptional modulation of gene expression. Translational control most commonly targets the initiation of protein synthesis: loading 40S ribosome complexes onto mRNA and AUG start codon recognition. This step is initiated by eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) (the m7GTP cap-binding protein), whose binding to eIF4G (a scaffolding subunit) and eIF4A (an ATP-dependent RNA helicase) leads to assembly of active eIF4F complex. The ability of eIF4E to recognize the cap is prevented by its binding to eIF4E binding protein (4E-BP), which thereby inhibits cap-dependent translation by sequestering eIF4E. The 4E-BP activity is, in turn, inhibited by mTORC1 [mTOR (the mechanistic target of rapamycin) complex 1] mediated phosphorylation. Here, we define a previously unidentified mechanism of mTOR-independent 4E-BP1 regulation that is used by chondrocytes upon FGF signaling. Chondrocytes are responsible for the formation of the skeleton long bones. Unlike the majority of cell types where FGF signaling triggers proliferation, chondrocytes respond to FGF with inhibition. We establish that FGF specifically suppresses protein synthesis in chondrocytes, but not in any other cells of mesenchymal origin. Furthermore, 4E-BP1 repressor activity is necessary not only for suppression of protein synthesis, but also for FGF-induced cell-cycle arrest. Importantly, FGF-induced changes in the 4E-BP1 activity observed in cell culture are likewise detected in vivo and reflect the action of FGF signaling on downstream targets during bone development. Thus, our findings demonstrate that FGF signaling differentially impacts protein synthesis through either stimulation or repression, in a cell-type-dependent manner, with 4E-BP1 being a key player.

Indexed as

Protein BiosynthesisAnimalsCarrier ProteinsCell Line, TumorChondrocytesChondrogenesisFibroblast Growth FactorsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsPhosphoproteinsRatsTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesCarrier ProteinsEif4ebp1 protein, ratFibroblast Growth FactorsIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsPhosphoproteinsTOR Serine-Threonine Kinases4E-BPchondrocytesFGFtranslational control

Identifiers

PMID27313212
PMCPMC4941506
OpenAlexW2432196053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.