Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27312936›Full record

ArticleThe Laryngoscope2017

Selective stimulation of facial muscles with a penetrating electrode array in the feline model.

Ronald Sahyouni, Jay Bhatt, Hamid R Djalilian, William C Tang, John C Middlebrooks, Harrison W Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Laryngoscope, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. High-resolution ultrasonography of the normal extratemporal facial nerve.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2018
    Article
  5. Selective Stimulation of Facial Muscles Following Chronic Intraneural Electrode Array Implantation and Facial Nerve Injury in the Feline Model.Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology · 2017
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ronald SahyouniMedical Scientist Training Program, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, U.S.A.
Jay BhattDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, U.S.A.
Hamid R DjalilianDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, U.S.A.
William C TangSchool of Medicine, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, U.S.A.
John C MiddlebrooksDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, U.S.A.
Harrison W LinDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, U.S.A.
University of California, Irvine · US

Funding

University of California Health Participation in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR001414 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M, VILAIN, ERIC J. · 2015 to 2023
$35.1M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001416 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI CAIOZZO, VINCENT JAMES, DEMETRIOU, MICHAEL · 2015 to 2023
$5.6M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001416NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives/hypothesisPermanent facial nerve injury is a difficult challenge for both patients and physicians given its potential for debilitating functional, cosmetic, and psychological sequelae. Although current surgical interventions have provided considerable advancements in facial nerve rehabilitation, they often fail to fully address all impairments. We aim to introduce an alternative approach to facial nerve rehabilitation. STUDY

designAcute experiments in animals with normal facial function.

methodsThe study included three anesthetized cats. Four facial muscles (levator auris longus, orbicularis oculi, nasalis, and orbicularis oris) were monitored with a standard electromyographic (EMG) facial nerve monitoring system with needle electrodes. The main trunk of the facial nerve was exposed, and a 16-channel penetrating electrode array was placed into the nerve. Electrical current pulses were delivered to each stimulating electrode individually. Elicited EMG voltage outputs were recorded for each muscle.

resultsStimulation through individual channels selectively activated restricted nerve populations, resulting in selective contraction of individual muscles. Increasing stimulation current levels resulted in increasing EMG voltage responses. Typically, selective activation of two or more distinct muscles was successfully achieved via a single placement of the multi-channel electrode array by selection of appropriate stimulation channels.

conclusionWe have established in the animal model the ability of a penetrating electrode array to selectively stimulate restricted fiber populations within the facial nerve and to selectively elicit contractions in specific muscles and regions of the face. These results show promise for the development of a facial nerve implant system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.Laryngoscope, 2016 127:460-465, 2017.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalElectrodes, ImplantedAnimalsCatsComputer GraphicsElectric StimulationElectromyographyFacial MusclesFacial NerveFacial ParalysisMuscle ContractionNerve FibersNeuronsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedVideo RecordingFacial nervefacial nerve implantfacial stimulationmulti-channel electrode array

Identifiers

PMID27312936
PMCPMC5760213
OpenAlexW2435218062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.