ArticlePediatric cardiology2016
Holodiastolic Flow Reversal at the Descending Aorta on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance is Neither Sensitive Nor Specific for Significant Aortic Regurgitation in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Holodiastolic Flow Reversal in the Descending Aorta: A Marker of Concomitant Acute Myocarditis and Aortitis in Children-A Case Series: Response to the Letter to the Editor.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Comprehensive 4D-flow cardiac magnetic resonance evaluation of the descending thoracic aorta in aortic regurgitation.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2025Article
- Echocardiographic assessment of aortic regurgitation: a narrative review.Echo research and practice · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Holodiastolic flow reversal in the descending aorta on echocardiogram suggests significant aortic regurgitation. The study aim was to determine whether the presence of holodiastolic flow reversal on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) correlates with aortic valve regurgitant fraction. We retrospectively reviewed 166 cardiac MRIs (64 % male, age 14.1 ± 9.5 years) from January 2011 to May 2012 where velocity mapping was acquired at both the aortic valve and the descending aorta at the level of the diaphragm. Descending aorta velocity maps were checked for baseline offset using a static reference region. Holodiastolic flow reversal was defined as flow reversal throughout diastole both before and after baseline correction. Significant aortic regurgitation was defined as regurgitant fraction >10 %. Aortic valve regurgitant fraction was <10 % in 144 patients (Group A), 10-20 % inclusive in 7 patients (Group B), and >20 % in 15 patients (Group C). Though the aortic valve regurgitant fraction was significantly higher for patients with holodiastolic flow reversal versus those without (8.5 ± 14.2 vs. 3.8 ± 6.6 %, p = 0.02), holodiastolic flow reversal was present in 32 Group A patients (22 %). In comparison, 4 Group B patients (57 %) and 7 Group C patients (47 %) had holodiastolic flow reversal. The sensitivity (Groups B and C) was 0.5, and the specificity (Group A) was 0.78. Holodiastolic flow reversal in the descending aorta on cardiac MRI was neither sensitive nor specific for predicting significant aortic regurgitation in this study population. Holodiastolic flow reversal in the absence of significant aortic regurgitation may be a relatively common finding in patients with congenital heart disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.