ReviewNeuropsychologia2016
The problem of being bad at faces.
Review in Neuropsychologia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed.
- Facial Motion Enhances Face Recognition and Guides Visual Attention in Typical Recognisers and Developmental Prosopagnosia.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- A highly sensitive famous face recognition paradigm for prosopagnosia screening.Behavior research methods · 2026Article
- Impaired face identity discrimination in individuals with cerebral visual impairment: a pilot study.Annals of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Frequency-specific neural abnormalities in congenital prosopagnosia revealed by magnetoencephalography during face perception.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- EGEFACE: A new face memory test with static and dynamic images.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Assessment of Developmental Prosopagnosia in an Individual with Tourette Syndrome and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: A Case Report.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Scanning faces: a deep learning approach to studying eye movements in prosopagnosia.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Measure twice, cut once: Moving toward more inclusive, principled criteria for diagnosing developmental prosopagnosia.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024Article
- Perceptual heterogeneity in developmental prosopagnosia is continuous, not categorical.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2024Article
- Decoding face recognition abilities in the human brain.PNAS nexus · 2024Article
- Evidence for a Classical Dissociation between Face and Object Recognition in Developmental Prosopagnosia.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Familial Transmission of Developmental Prosopagnosia: New Case Reports from an Extended Family and Identical Twins.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Exploration of the Links Between Psychosocial Well-being and Face Recognition Skills in a French-Speaking Sample.Psychologica Belgica · 2024Article
- A novel, rapid, quantitative method for face discrimination.PloS one · 2024Article
- A new approach to diagnosing and researching developmental prosopagnosia: Excluded cases are impaired too.Behavior research methods · 2023Article
- The Neural Correlates of Developmental Prosopagnosia: Twenty-Five Years on.Brain sciences · 2023Review
- Article
- What is the prevalence of developmental prosopagnosia? An empirical assessment of different diagnostic cutoffs.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2023Article
- Preference for horizontal information in faces predicts typical variations in face recognition but is not impaired in developmental prosopagnosia.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Developmental prosopagnosia has received increased attention in recent years, but as yet has no confirmed genetic or structural markers. It is not certain whether this condition reflects simply the low-end of the spectrum of normal face recognition, an 'under-development', or a pathologic failure to develop such mechanisms, a 'mal-development'. This difference in views creates challenges for the diagnosis of developmental prosopagnosia by behavioural criteria alone, which also vary substantially between studies, with secondary effects on issues such as determining its prevalence. After review of the literature and the problems inherent to diagnoses based solely on behavioural data, we propose as a starting discussion point a set of two primary and four secondary criteria for the diagnosis of developmental prosopagnosia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.