Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27312662›Full record

ArticleAmbio2016

On the sustainability of inland fisheries: Finding a future for the forgotten.

Steven J Cooke, Edward H Allison, T Douglas Beard, Robert Arlinghaus, Angela H Arthington, Devin M Bartley, Ian G Cowx, Carlos Fuentevilla, Nancy J Leonard, Kai Lorenzen and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
29.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 212 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Global hidden harvest of freshwater fish revealed by household surveys.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  13. Counting the fish eaten rather than the fish caught.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Steven J CookeFish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada. steven_cooke@carleton.ca.
Edward H AllisonSchool of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
T Douglas BeardNational Climate Change and Wildlife Science Center, United States Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA.
Robert ArlinghausDepartment of Biology and Ecology of Fishes, Faculty of Life Sciences, Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, and Integrative Fisheries Management and Integrative Research Institute for the Transformation of Human-Environmental Systems, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Angela H ArthingtonAustralian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Logan, QLD, Australia.
Devin M BartleyFisheries and Aquaculture Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
Ian G CowxHull International Fisheries Institute, University of Hull, Hull, UK.
Carlos FuentevillaFisheries and Aquaculture Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.
Nancy J LeonardNorthwest Power and Conservation Council, Portland, OR, USA.
Kai LorenzenFisheries and Aquatic Sciences, School of Forest Resource and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Abigail J LynchNational Climate Change and Wildlife Science Center, United States Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA.
Vivian M NguyenFish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
So-Jung YounDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability, East Lansing, MI, USA.
William W TaylorDepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife, Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Robin L WelcommeDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College of London, Silwood Park, UK.
Carleton University · CAFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations · ITGriffith University · AUHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEImperial College London · GBUnited States Geological Survey · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Hull · GBUniversity of Washington · USWildlife Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

At present, inland fisheries are not often a national or regional governance priority and as a result, inland capture fisheries are undervalued and largely overlooked. As such they are threatened in both developing and developed countries. Indeed, due to lack of reliable data, inland fisheries have never been part of any high profile global fisheries assessment and are notably absent from the Sustainable Development Goals. The general public and policy makers are largely ignorant of the plight of freshwater ecosystems and the fish they support, as well as the ecosystem services generated by inland fisheries. This ignorance is particularly salient given that the current emphasis on the food-water-energy nexus often fails to include the important role that inland fish and fisheries play in food security and supporting livelihoods in low-income food deficit countries. Developing countries in Africa and Asia produce about 11 million tonnes of inland fish annually, 90 % of the global total. The role of inland fisheries goes beyond just kilocalories; fish provide important micronutrients and essentially fatty acids. In some regions, inland recreational fisheries are important, generating much wealth and supporting livelihoods. The following three key recommendations are necessary for action if inland fisheries are to become a part of the food-water-energy discussion: invest in improved valuation and assessment methods, build better methods to effectively govern inland fisheries (requires capacity building and incentives), and develop approaches to managing waters across sectors and scales. Moreover, if inland fisheries are recognized as important to food security, livelihoods, and human well-being, they can be more easily incorporated in regional, national, and global policies and agreements on water issues. Through these approaches, inland fisheries can be better evaluated and be more fully recognized in broader water resource and aquatic ecosystem planning and decision-making frameworks, enhancing their value and sustainability for the future.

Indexed as

Environmental PolicyAnimalsCommunity ParticipationConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemFisheriesFishesFood-water-energy nexusGovernanceInland fisheriesIntegrated water resources managementSustainability

Identifiers

PMID27312662
PMCPMC5055481
OpenAlexW2420779924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.