Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27312499›Full record

ArticleMethods in cell biology2016

Quantitative methods for studying hemostasis in zebrafish larvae.

M S Rost, S J Grzegorski, J A Shavit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in cell biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Magnetically powered microwheel thrombolysis of occlusive thrombi in zebrafish.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Fishing for answers to hemostatic and thrombotic disease: Genome editing in zebrafish.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M S RostUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
S J GrzegorskiUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
J A ShavitUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.

Funding

MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007863 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI COLLINS, KATHLEEN L. · 1985 to 2024
$38.3M
Training Program in Molecular HematologyT32HL007622 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SUNG WON CHOI, Jordan A. Shavit · 1986 to 2026
$9.2M
Dissecting the Genetics of Human Hemostatic Disorders Using ZebrafishR01HL124232 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SHAVIT, JORDAN A · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
Training Program in Translational Cardiovascular Research and EntrepreneurshipT32HL125242 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MICHELE, DANIEL E · 2015 to 2024
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL124232NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007622NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL125242NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hemostasis is a coordinated system through which blood is prevented from exiting a closed circulatory system. We have taken advantage of the zebrafish, an emerging model for the study of blood coagulation, and describe three techniques for quantitative analysis of primary and secondary hemostasis. Collectively, these three techniques comprise a toolset to aid in our understanding of hemostasis and pathological clotting.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood CoagulationHemostasisHumansLarvaThrombosisZebrafishClottingCoagulationFibrinogenHematologyHemostasisThrombosisZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID27312499
PMCPMC5023325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.