Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27312269›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2016

Western diet and the weakening of the interoceptive stimulus control of appetitive behavior.

Camille H Sample, Sabrina Jones, Sara L Hargrave, Leonard E Jarrard, Terry L Davidson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Camille H SampleCenter for Behavioral Neuroscience and Department of Psychology, American University, Washington, DC, United States.
Sabrina JonesCenter for Behavioral Neuroscience and Department of Psychology, American University, Washington, DC, United States.
Sara L HargraveCenter for Behavioral Neuroscience and Department of Psychology, American University, Washington, DC, United States.
Leonard E JarrardDepartment of Psychology, Washington & Lee University, Lexington, VA, United States.
Terry L DavidsonCenter for Behavioral Neuroscience and Department of Psychology, American University, Washington, DC, United States. Electronic address: terryd@american.edu.

Funding

SIGNALS TO FEED: BIOLOGICAL AND ASSOCIATIVE MECHANISMSR01HD028792 · NICHD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI DAVIDSON, TERRY L · 1991 to 2014
$2.2M
Signals to Feed: Biological and Associative MechanismsR01DK110412 · NIDDK · AMERICAN UNIVERSITY · PI DAVIDSON, TERRY L · 2016 to 2019
$1.3M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD028792NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK110412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In obesogenic environments food-related external cues are thought to overwhelm internal cues that normally regulate energy intake. We investigated how this shift from external to internal stimulus control might occur. Experiment 1 showed that rats could use stimuli arising from 0 and 4h food deprivation to predict sucrose delivery. Experiment 2 then examined (a) the ability of these deprivation cues to compete with external cues and (b) how consuming a Western-style diet (WD) affects that competition. Rats were trained to use both their deprivation cues and external cues as compound discriminative stimuli. Half of the rats were then placed on WD while the others remained on chow, and external cues were removed to assess learning about deprivation state cues. When tested with external cues removed, chow-fed rats continued to discriminate using only deprivation cues, while WD-fed rats did not. The WD-fed group performed similarly to control groups trained with a noncontingent relationship between deprivation cues and sucrose reinforcement. Previous studies provided evidence that discrimination based on interoceptive deprivation cues depends on the hippocampus and that WD intake could interfere with hippocampal functioning. A third experiment assessed the effects of neurotoxic hippocampal lesions on weight gain and on sensitivity to the appetite-suppressing effects of the satiety hormone cholecystokinin (CCK). Relative to controls, hippocampal-lesioned rats gained more weight and showed reduced sensitivity to a 1.0ug but not 2.0 or 4.0ug CCK doses. These findings suggest that WD intake reduces utilization of interoceptive energy state signals to regulate appetitive behavior via a mechanism that involves the hippocampus.

Indexed as

Appetitive BehaviorCuesDiet, WesternInteroceptionAnimalsCholecystokininDiscrimination LearningEatingFood DeprivationHippocampusMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySucroseCholecystokininSucroseExternalityHippocampusLearningMemoryObesitySatiety

Identifiers

PMID27312269
PMCPMC5404739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.