ArticleScientific reports2016
Comparison of six commercial kits to extract bacterial chromosome and plasmid DNA for MiSeq sequencing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.
- Performance of the pBHR1 mobilization protein MobV and its role in stable plasmid expression inMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Sample Preparation for Multi-Omics Analysis: Considerations and Guidance for Identifying the Ideal Workflow.Proteomics · 2025Review
- Genome sequences of four endophytic Bacillaceae from wild lettuce.Microbiology resource announcements · 2025Article
- Parallel Detection of the Unamplified Carbapenem Resistance GenesBiosensors · 2025Article
- Illumina MiSeq 16S rRNA Gene Library Preparation for Poultry Processing Microbiome Analyses.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Characteristics of phage-plasmids and their impact on microbial communities.Essays in biochemistry · 2024Review
- Comparative evaluation of commercial DNA isolation approaches for nanopore-only bacterial genome assembly and plasmid recovery.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Detection ofMicroorganisms · 2024Article
- Methodologic Considerations for Studying the Ocular Surface Microbiome.Ophthalmology science · 2023Review
- Digital PCR: a tool in clostridial mutant selection and detection.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Optimizing DNA Extraction from Pediatric Stool for Diagnosis of Tuberculosis and Use in Next-Generation Sequencing Applications.Microbiology spectrum · 2023Article
- The mobile gene cassette carrying tetracycline resistance genes inFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Three Distinct Annotation Platforms Differ in Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance Genes in Long-Read, Short-Read, and Hybrid Sequences Derived from Total Genomic DNA or from Purified Plasmid DNA.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Synthetic Biology Tool Development Advances Predictable Gene Expression in the Metabolically Versatile Soil BacteriumFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Evaluation of high molecular weight DNA extraction methods for long-read sequencing of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli.PloS one · 2022Article
- Characterization of virulence and antimicrobial resistance genes ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Article
- A Simple, Cost-Effective, and Automation-Friendly Direct PCR Approach for Bacterial Community Analysis.mSystems · 2021Article
- Whole Genome Sequencing Provides an Added Value to the Investigation of Staphylococcal Food Poisoning Outbreaks.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Connecting primitive phase separation to biotechnology, synthetic biology, and engineering.Journal of biosciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We compared commercial kits for extraction of genomic DNA from the Gram-negative bacterium Klebsiella pneumoniae for subsequent Miseq sequencing. Purification of DNA was based on matrix binding (silica or anion exchange resin) or differential precipitation (salting out), respectively. The choice of extraction kit had little effect on sequencing quality and coverage across drastically different replicons, except for an apparent depletion of small plasmids (<5 kb) during precipitation-based extractions. Sequencing coverage provided copy-number estimates for small plasmids that were consistently higher than those from quantitative real-time PCR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.