Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27311884›Full record

ArticleTransfusion2016

Remobilization of hematopoietic stem cells in healthy donors for allogeneic transplantation.

Mark A Fiala, Soo Park, Michael Slade, John F DiPersio, Keith E Stockerl-Goldstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transfusion, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark A FialaDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri. mfiala@DOM.wustl.edu.
Soo ParkDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Michael SladeDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
John F DiPersioDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Keith E Stockerl-GoldsteinDivision of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesTL1TR000449 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000449NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe need to repeat peripheral blood (PB) stem cell mobilization and collection in healthy donors arises infrequently but may be required due to insufficient initial collection, graft failure, or relapse of the recipient's disease. Little data exist on the efficacy of remobilization. Therefore, we retrospectively reviewed 18 years of remobilization records from healthy stem cell donors at our institution. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsWe identified 62 healthy donors who underwent remobilization, a cohort of 30 mobilized and remobilized with cytokines and a cohort of 32 mobilized with a CXCR4 antagonist and remobilized with cytokines. For each cohort we compared the PB CD34+/L level, the number of CD34+ cells collected/kg (recipient weight), and the number of CD34+ cells/L collected on the first day of leukapheresis during initial mobilization and remobilization.

resultsInitial mobilization with cytokines was associated with reduced remobilization. The mean PB CD34/L level at initial mobilization was 69 × 10(6) compared to 37 × 10(6) at remobilization (p = 0.029). In contrast, initial mobilization with a CXCR4 antagonist was not associated with reduced remobilization. The mean PB CD34/L level at initial mobilization was 15 × 10(6) compared to 68 × 10(6) at remobilization (p < 0.001). In both cohorts, initial mobilization results were positively correlated with remobilization results but the interval between was not.

conclusionsThis study suggests that poor remobilization yields may be due to decreased efficacy of cytokines after repeat exposure. The underlying mechanism of these findings remains unclear and further studies are needed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntigens, CD34BenzylaminesCyclamsFemaleGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHematopoietic Stem Cell MobilizationHematopoietic Stem CellsHeterocyclic CompoundsHumansLeukapheresisMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAntigens, CD34BenzylaminesCyclamsGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHeterocyclic Compoundsplerixafor

Identifiers

PMID27311884
PMCPMC5205536
OpenAlexW2426995998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.