Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27311739›Full record

Trial reportSingapore medical journal2017

Combining levodopa and virtual reality-based therapy for rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke: pilot study Part II.

Geoffrey Sithamparapillai Samuel, Nicodemus Edrick Oey, Min Choo, Han Ju, Wai Yin Chan, Stanley Kok, Yu Ge, Antonius M Van Dongen, Yee Sien Ng

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Singapore medical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Geoffrey Sithamparapillai SamuelDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Nicodemus Edrick OeyDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Min ChooDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Han JuDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Wai Yin ChanDepartment of Occupational Therapy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Stanley KokPillar of Information Systems Technology and Design, Singapore University of Technology and Design, Singapore.
Yu GeA*STAR Institute for Infocomm Research, Singapore.
Antonius M Van DongenNeuroscience Department, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Yee Sien NgDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Duke-NUS Medical School · SGSingapore General Hospital · SGAgency for Science, Technology and Research · SGSingapore University of Technology and Design · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a combination of levodopa and virtual reality (VR)-based therapy for the enhancement of upper limb recovery following acute stroke.

methodsThis was a pilot single-blinded case series of acute stroke patients with upper extremity hemiparesis. Patients were randomised to standard care with concomitant administration of either levodopa alone (control group) or combination therapy consisting of VR-based motivational visuomotor feedback training with levodopa neuromodulation (VR group). Main clinical outcome measures were the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity (FM-UE) assessment and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Kinematic measurements of affected upper limb movement were evaluated as a secondary measure of improvement.

resultsOf 42 patients screened, four patients were enrolled in each of the two groups. Two patients dropped out from the control group during the trial. Patients receiving combination therapy had clinically significant improvements in FM-UE assessment scores of 16.5 points compared to a 3.0-point improvement among control patients. Similarly, ARAT scores of VR group patients improved by 15.3 points compared to a 10.0-point improvement in the control group. Corresponding improvements were noted in kinematic measures, including hand-path ratio, demonstrating that the quality of upper limb movement improved in the VR group.

conclusionOur results suggest that VR-based therapy and pharmacotherapy may be combined for acute stroke rehabilitation. Bedside acquisition of kinematic measurements allows accurate assessment of the quality of limb movement, offering a sensitive clinical tool for quantifying motor recovery during the rehabilitation process after acute stroke.

Indexed as

Virtual Reality Exposure TherapyAcute DiseaseAgedBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationDopamineDopamine AgentsExtremitiesFemaleHumansLevodopaMaleMiddle AgedMovementParesisPilot ProjectsDopamineDopamine AgentsLevodopadopaminekinematicsrehabilitationstrokevirtual-reality

Identifiers

PMID27311739
PMCPMC5651508
OpenAlexW2433860381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.