Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27311726›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2016

WHO grade II meningioma: a retrospective study for outcome and prognostic factor assessment.

Charles Champeaux, Elena Wilson, Colin Shieff, Akbar Ali Khan, Lewis Thorne

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Malignant Transformation of Meningioma WithBrain tumor research and treatment · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Meningioma recurrence: Time for an online prediction tool?Surgical neurology international · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Charles ChampeauxVictor Horsley Department of Neurosurgical, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, 33 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK. Charles.Champeaux@gmail.com.
Elena WilsonDepartment of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
Colin ShieffVictor Horsley Department of Neurosurgical, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, 33 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
Akbar Ali KhanVictor Horsley Department of Neurosurgical, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, 33 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
Lewis ThorneVictor Horsley Department of Neurosurgical, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, 33 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To analyse the outcome of patients with WHO grade II meningioma and identify factors that may influence recurrence and survival. Between January 2007 and September 2015, a retrospective search identified 194 WHO grade II meningiomas at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London. Survival methods were implemented. 31 patients (16 %) had a previous history of grade I meningioma. The patients underwent a total of 344 surgical resections and 43.3 % received radiotherapy. 55 patients (28.4 %) had been re-operated on for a WHO grade II meningioma relapse. Median follow-up was 4.4 years. At the end of the study, 75 patients (40.1 %) had no residual tumour on the last scan. Surgical recurrence free survival at 5 years was 71.6, 95 % CI [63.5, 80.8]. Secondary grade II meningioma (HR = 2.29, p = 0.010), and, Simpson resection grade 1, 2 and 3 vs. 4 and 5 (HR = 0.57, p = 0.050) were associated with the surgical recurrence-free survival. 32 died from meningioma (16.5 %). Overall survival probability at 5 years was 83.2, 95 % CI [76.6, 90.4]. Age at diagnosis (HR = 0.22, p < 0.001), WHO grade I meningioma progressing into grade II (HR = 3.2, p = 0.001), tumour location (HR = 0.19, p < 0.001), and mitosis count (HR = 0.36, p = 0.010) were independently associated with the overall survival. Patients who received radiotherapy demonstrated neither a reduced risk of recurrence nor a longer overall survival (p = 0.310). In our series shorter survival correlated with older age, increased mitoses, progression from grade I to II and location. We were not able to demonstrate a significant improvement in any of the clinical outcomes after radiotherapy.

Indexed as

Treatment OutcomeAdultAgedCognition DisordersFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaMiddle AgedNeurosurgical ProceduresPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRadiotherapyRetrospective StudiesAtypical meningiomaPrognostic factorsRadiotherapyRecurrenceWHO grade II meningioma

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.