Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27311698›Full record

ReviewLangenbeck's archives of surgery2016

German national guideline on the management of pilonidal disease.

I Iesalnieks, A Ommer, S Petersen, D Doll, A Herold

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03914729 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Mobilized Gluteus Maximus Muscle Fascia Flap Versus Primary Closure in the Treatment of Primary and Recurrent Pilonidal Sinus Disease.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRussian Society of Colorectal SurgeonsRan2017 to 2024Enrolled84ConditionsPilonidal SinusArmsPrimary Closure, Gluteus Maximus Fascia Plasty Flap
NCT05474911 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Randomized comparative clinical study between two treatment strategies in patients with pilonidal sinus: conventional care versus negative pressure therapy.

TypeinterventionalSponsorSebastiano BiondoRan2022 to 2023Enrolled94ConditionsPilonidal Sinus, Wound HealArmsNegative pressure therapy, Conventional wound care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. [Research on deep learning-based pathological image classification of pilonidal sinus].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Acute pilonidal abscess: Prospective nationwide audit in the Netherlands.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Pilonidal reality calls for action.The British journal of surgery · 2024
    Article
  18. Efficacy of laser obliteration with limited excision of pilonidal sinus.The Journal of international medical research · 2024
    Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

I IesalnieksDepartment of Surgery, Städtisches Klinikum München Bogenhausen, Englschalkinger Str. 77, 81925, Munich, Germany. iesalnieks_igors@hotmail.com.
A OmmerEnd- und Dickdarm-Zentrum Essen, Essen, Germany.
S PetersenDepartment of Surgery, Asklepios-Klinik Altona, Hamburg, Germany.
D DollDepartment of Surgery, St. Marienhospital Vechta, Vechta, Germany.
A HeroldEnd- und Dickdarmzentrum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Asklepios Klinik Altona · DEMünchen Klinik Bogenhausen · DEUniversity of Vechta · DEWest German Heart and Vascular Center Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe present national guideline aims to provide recommendations for physicians involved in the treatment of patients with pilonidal disease. It has been published previously as an extended version in German language.

methodsThis is a systemic literature review. The present guideline was reviewed and accepted by an expert panel in a consensus conference.

resultsSome of the present guideline conclusions were based on low- to moderate-quality trials. Therefore, an agreement was necessary in those cases to provide recommendations. However, recommendations regarding the most frequently used surgical procedures were based on numerous prospective randomized trials.

conclusionsAn asymptomatic pilonidal disease does not require treatment. A pilonidal abscess should be incised. After regression of the acute inflammation, a definitive treatment method should be applied. An excision is the standard treatment method for the chronic pilonidal disease. Open wound healing is associated with a low postoperative morbidity rate; however, it is complicated by a long healing time. The minimally invasive procedures (e.g., pit picking surgery) represent a potential treatment option for a limited chronic pilonidal disease. However, the recurrence rate is higher compared to open healing. Excision followed by a midline wound closure is associated with a considerable recurrence rate and increased incidence of wound complications and should therefore be abandoned. Off-midline procedures can be adopted as a primary treatment option in chronic pilonidal disease. At present, there is no evidence of any outcome differences between various off-midline procedures. The Limberg flap and the Karydakis flap are most thoroughly analyzed off-midline procedures.

Indexed as

GermanyHumansPilonidal SinusPractice Guidelines as TopicWound Closure TechniquesWound HealingPilonidal abscessPilonidal diseasePilonidal sinusSurgery

Identifiers

PMID27311698
OpenAlexW2441166207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.