ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2016
Improving the value of clinical research through the use of Common Data Elements.
Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
85 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Continuity of outcome assessment throughout the lifecycle of surgical research: mapping core outcome domains measured in early phase and late phase studies.BMC surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Addressing Systematic Missing Data in the Context of Causally Interpretable Meta-analysis.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023Pooled it
- The Impact of Psychosocial Stress from Life Trauma and Racial Discrimination on Epigenetic Aging-A Systematic Review.Biological research for nursing · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Employed in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (aSAH) Clinical Research.Neurocritical care · 2019Pooled it
- A proposed organization of multifaceted knowledge in data repositories: structuring record collections and evidence sets for data lakehouses and moonshots.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2026Review
- A new AI assisted approach aligns data standards and accelerates interoperability in biomedical research.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Integrating real-world data with gold-standard longitudinal clinical and genomic data to advance precision medicine for the Alzheimer's Disease Research Center Program and beyond: a proof-of-concept data platform.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Adopting common data elements (CDEs) for the National Trauma Research Repository (NTRR): the results of an acute hospital Delphi survey.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Article
- A severity-anchored, patient-reported outcome framework for clinical trials in post-stroke dysphagia.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- Adopting common data elements (CDEs) for the National Trauma Research Repository (NTRR): the results of an outcome, outcome measures, and rehabilitation Delphi Survey.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2026Article
- Completeness of Common Data Elements for Breast Cancer Clinical Trials in Observational Databases.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2026Article
- Developing Tools for the Efficient Design of Health Preference Studies: Taxonomy of Attributes and Prototype of an Attribute Library.The patient · 2025Review
- Advancing research on strategies to reduce drug use and overdose-related harms: a community informed approach to establishing common data elements.Harm reduction journal · 2025Article
- Automated Integration of AI Results into Radiology Reports Using Common Data Elements.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Common data elements for observational studies in ocular toxoplasmosis: a Delphi consensus.Journal of ophthalmic inflammation and infection · 2025Article
- A CDE-based data structure for radiotherapeutic decision-making in breast cancer.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Strengthening Older Adults Remembering (SOARing): Research protocol for a multi-site randomized clinical trial examining the efficacy of the Kessler Foundation modified Story Memory Technique (KF-mSMT®) in Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI).Contemporary clinical trials · 2025Article
- A community-engaged approach to developing common data elements: a case study from the RADx-UP Long COVID common data elements Task Force.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- Common data elements for food allergy clinical trials: an overview.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2025Review
25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of Common Data Elements can facilitate cross-study comparisons, data aggregation, and meta-analyses; simplify training and operations; improve overall efficiency; promote interoperability between different systems; and improve the quality of data collection. A Common Data Element is a combination of a precisely defined question (variable) paired with a specified set of responses to the question that is common to multiple datasets or used across different studies. Common Data Elements, especially when they conform to accepted standards, are identified by research communities from variable sets currently in use or are newly developed to address a designated data need. There are no formal international specifications governing the construction or use of Common Data Elements. Consequently, Common Data Elements tend to be made available by research communities on an empiric basis. Some limitations of Common Data Elements are that there may still be differences across studies in the interpretation and implementation of the Common Data Elements, variable validity in different populations, and inhibition by some existing research practices and the use of legacy data systems. Current National Institutes of Health efforts to support Common Data Element use are linked to the strengthening of National Institutes of Health Data Sharing policies and the investments in data repositories. Initiatives include cross-domain and domain-specific resources, construction of a Common Data Element Portal, and establishment of trans-National Institutes of Health working groups to address technical and implementation topics. The National Institutes of Health is seeking to lower the barriers to Common Data Element use through greater awareness and encourage the culture change necessary for their uptake and use. As National Institutes of Health, other agencies, professional societies, patient registries, and advocacy groups continue efforts to develop and promote the responsible use of Common Data Elements, particularly if linked to accepted data standards and terminologies, continued engagement with and feedback from the research community will remain important.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.