ArticleJournal of community health2016
Factors Associated with the Accurate Diagnosis of Obesity.
Article in Journal of community health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Documentation of overweight or obesity diagnosis codes during adult primary care encounters.Obesity pillars · 2026Article
- Paediatric obesity: Documentation, screening, and pharmacotherapy in a national cohort.Pediatric obesity · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obesity is a growing epidemic, yet few patients with obesity receive a clinical diagnosis of obesity or appropriate counseling. We examined the socioeconomic and demographic factors associated with the accurate diagnosis of obesity during ambulatory care visits. We used data from the National Hospital Ambulatory and National Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys (NHAMCS and NAMCS) to determine if a patient with obesity had been clinically diagnosed with obesity during the visit by either of the following: (1) a diagnosis listed in the patient's record; or (2) the provider's answer to the question "despite the diagnoses listed, does this patient have obesity?" We used multivariate models to examine the association between the accurate diagnosis of obesity and socioeconomic and demographic factors. We examined 885,291,770 weighted office visits involving individuals 5 years of age and older between 2006 and 2010. Providers were less likely to diagnose obesity at office visits involving children (5-12 years) with obesity (23.4 %) than at visits for adolescents (13-21 years; 39.7 %), young adults (22-34 years; 45.4 %), adults (35-64 years; 43.9 %) or elderly adults (≥65 years; 39.6 %; P < 0.001 for all). Individuals with obesity residing in more highly educated areas were more likely to be diagnosed than those living in less highly educated areas (44.2 vs. 40.9 %; AOR 1.4; 95 % CI 1.2-1.6). Males with obesity were less likely to be diagnosed than females with obesity (36.1 vs. 45.8 %; AOR 0.7; 95 % CI 0.6-0.8). After controlling for socioeconomic-status we did not find a consistent difference in the diagnosis of obesity by race. The diagnosis of obesity was made at less than half of all office visits involving patients with obesity. Children, adolescents, elderly, males, and those living in less educated areas were less likely to be accurately diagnosed with obesity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.