Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27311306›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2016

Cognitive and Functional Consequence of Cardiac Arrest.

Claudia A Perez, Niyatee Samudra, Venkatesh Aiyagari

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Lance-Adams syndrome associated with cerebellar pathology.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Claudia A PerezDepartment of Neurological Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390-8855, USA.
Niyatee SamudraDepartment of Neurology and Neurotherapeutics, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
Venkatesh AiyagariDepartment of Neurological Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390-8855, USA. Venkatesh.Aiyagari@UTSouthwestern.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac arrest is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Better-quality bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation training, cardiocerebral resuscitation principles, and intensive post-resuscitation hospital care have improved survival. However, cognitive and functional impairment after cardiac arrest remain areas of concern. Research focus has shifted beyond prognostication in the immediate post-arrest period to identification of mechanisms for long-term brain injury and implementation of promising protocols to reduce neuronal injury. These include therapeutic temperature management (TTM), as well as pharmacologic and psychological interventions which also improve overall neurological function. Comprehensive assessment of cognitive function post-arrest is hampered by heterogeneous measures among studies. However, the domains of attention, long-term memory, spatial memory, and executive function appear to be affected. As more patients survive cardiac arrest for longer periods of time, there needs to be a greater focus on interventions that can enhance cognitive and psychosocial function post-arrest.

Indexed as

CognitionHeart ArrestAnimalsCardiopulmonary ResuscitationHumansHypoxia, BrainCardiac arrestCognitive FunctionDementiaHypoxic brain injuryOut of hospital cardiac arrest

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.