Observational studyMedicine2016
Prediction of future development of cardiovascular disease with an equation to estimate apolipoprotein B: A community-based cohort study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic implications of calculated Apo-lipoprotein B in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Outcome is tied to lower cut-points.Clinical cardiology · 2021Article
- Association between CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms and lipid metabolism in Chinese patients with ischemic stroke.The Journal of international medical research · 2020Article
- Validation of a Newly Developed Equation for Estimating Serum Apolipoprotein B: Associations with Cardiovascular Disease Surrogate Markers in Koreans.Yonsei medical journal · 2017Article
- Prediction of future cardiovascular disease with an equation to estimate apolipoprotein B in patients with high cardiovascular risk: an analysis from the TNT and IDEAL study.Lipids in health and disease · 2017Article
- Erratum: Medicine, Volume 95, Issue 24: Erratum.Medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Apolipoprotein B (apoB) has additional benefits over conventional lipid measurements in predicting future cardiovascular disease (CVD). We aimed to validate the clinical relevance of our equation to estimate apoB in a large-scale, prospective, community-based cohort study (Ansung-Ansan cohort study).A total of 9001 Korean subjects were assessed. We excluded subjects with history of CVD (n = 228), taking lipid-lowering medications (n = 51), and those whose outcome data were not available (n = 33). Finally, a total of 8713 subjects (4126 men and 4587 women) with a mean age of 52.2 years were enrolled and followed up biannually for a mean 8.1 years.At baseline, 24.9% of subjects were current smokers, 12.5% had diabetes, and 22.2% had hypertension. Incident case of CVD occurred in 600 of the study subjects (493 ischemic heart disease and 424 stroke). Independent variables included in the models were age, sex, waist circumference, current smoking, and presence of diabetes and hypertension. Both non-HDL cholesterol (HR per 1-SD [95% CI]; 1.13 [1.05-1.23], P = 0.002) and estimated apoB (HR per 1-SD [95% CI]; 1.14 [1.05-1.24], P = 0.001) were independently associated with the development of CVD; however, the LDL cholesterol level was not predictive of future CVD (HR per 1-SD [95% CI]; 1.07 [0.99-1.16], P = 0.08).Both non-HDL cholesterol and estimated apoB level were independently associated with the development of CVD. Because LDL cholesterol has limited value to predict incident CVD, we recommend calculating non-HDL cholesterol or apoB with our equation to predict risk of incident CVD in the general Korean population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.