Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27310615›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Impact of Chemotherapy on Diet and Nutritional Status of Women with Breast Cancer: A Prospective Study.

Isis Danyelle Dias Custódio, Eduarda da Costa Marinho, Cristiana Araújo Gontijo, Taísa Sabrina Silva Pereira, Carlos Eduardo Paiva, Yara Cristina de Paiva Maia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Food group intake and chemotherapy-induced toxicity: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Nutritional Strategies for Patients With Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers.The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Isis Danyelle Dias CustódioGraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Uberlandia, Uberlandia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2741-5110
Eduarda da Costa MarinhoGraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Uberlandia, Uberlandia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Cristiana Araújo GontijoGraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Uberlandia, Uberlandia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Taísa Sabrina Silva PereiraGraduate Program in Public Health, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, Espírito Santo, Brazil.
Carlos Eduardo PaivaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Graduate Program in Oncology, Palliative Care and Quality of Life Research Group (GPQual), Pio XII Foundation-Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Yara Cristina de Paiva MaiaGraduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Uberlandia, Uberlandia, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Uberlândia · BRHospital de Câncer de Barretos · BRUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Certain food groups are often rejected during chemotherapy (CT) due to the side effects of treatment, which may interfere with adequate diet and nutritional status. The aim of this study was to evaluate the treatment impact on the diet and nutritional status of women with breast cancer (BC). In this prospective longitudinal study, conducted in 2014-2015, 55 women diagnosed with BC, with a mean age 51.5±10.1 years, were followed and data were collected at three different times. Anthropometric and dietary assessments were performed, the latter by applying nine 24h dietary recalls, by using the Brazilian Healthy Eating Index Revised (BHEI-R), and calculating the prevalence of inadequacy by the EAR cut-off point method. Regarding the BHEI-R analysis, the majority of women had a "diet requires modification', both at the beginning (T0, 58.2%, n = 32) and during treatment (T1, 54.5%, n = 30). However, after the end of the CT, the greater percentage of patients (T2, 49.1%, n = 27) were classified as having an "inadequate diet", since the Total Fruit consumption as well as the Dark Green and Orange Vegetable and Legume consumption decreased significantly during treatment (p = 0.043 and p = 0.026, respectively). There was a significant reduction in the intake of macro and micronutrients, with a high prevalence of inadequacy, of up to 100%, for calcium, iron, phosphorus, magnesium, niacin, riboflavin, thiamin, vitamin B6, vitamin C and zinc. Assessment of the nutritional status indicated that 56% (n = 31) of patients were overweight at these three different times. Weight, BMI and Waist Circumference increased significantly, indicating a worse nutritional status, and there was a correlation between poor diet quality and higher values for BMI, Waist-Hip Ratio and Waist-to-Height Ratio. Chemotherapy interferes in the patients' diet generating a negative impact on the quality and intake of micro and macronutrients, as well as an impact on their nutritional status, with an increase in anthropometric measurements.

Indexed as

Nutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentAdultAgedBody Mass IndexBody WeightBrazilBreast NeoplasmsEnergy IntakeFeeding BehaviorFemaleFruitHumansMiddle AgedVegetablesVitaminsVitamins

Identifiers

PMID27310615
PMCPMC4911080
OpenAlexW2442717346

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.