Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27310531›Full record

ArticleeLife2016

Sensory experience modifies feature map relationships in visual cortex.

Shaun L Cloherty, Nicholas J Hughes, Markus A Hietanen, Partha S Bhagavatula, Geoffrey J Goodhill, Michael R Ibbotson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Binocular Circuitry as a Model for Understanding Experience-Dependent Circuit Development across the Mammalian Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  2. The world through infant eyes: Evidence for the early emergence of the cardinal orientation bias.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The Role of Visual Experience in Individual Differences of Brain Connectivity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Origins of Functional Organization in the Visual Cortex.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shaun L ClohertyNational Vision Research Institute, Australian College of Optometry, Carlton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7679-1764
Nicholas J HughesQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1657-4378
Markus A HietanenNational Vision Research Institute, Australian College of Optometry, Carlton, Australia.
Partha S BhagavatulaNational Vision Research Institute, Australian College of Optometry, Carlton, Australia.
Geoffrey J GoodhillQueensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9789-9355
Michael R IbbotsonNational Vision Research Institute, Australian College of Optometry, Carlton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3803-6653

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extent to which brain structure is influenced by sensory input during development is a critical but controversial question. A paradigmatic system for studying this is the mammalian visual cortex. Maps of orientation preference (OP) and ocular dominance (OD) in the primary visual cortex of ferrets, cats and monkeys can be individually changed by altered visual input. However, the spatial relationship between OP and OD maps has appeared immutable. Using a computational model we predicted that biasing the visual input to orthogonal orientation in the two eyes should cause a shift of OP pinwheels towards the border of OD columns. We then confirmed this prediction by rearing cats wearing orthogonally oriented cylindrical lenses over each eye. Thus, the spatial relationship between OP and OD maps can be modified by visual experience, revealing a previously unknown degree of brain plasticity in response to sensory input.

Indexed as

Orientation, SpatialVisual PerceptionAnimalsBrain MappingCatsDominance, OcularModels, NeurologicalVisual Cortexbrain developmentcatneuroscienceocular dominance maporientation pinwheelorientation preference mapplasticity

Identifiers

PMID27310531
PMCPMC4911216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.