ArticleeLife2016
Community-level cohesion without cooperation.
Article in eLife, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eco-evolutionary dynamics lead to functionally robust and redundant communities.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Density-dependent feedback and higher-order interactions enable coexistence in phage-bacteria community dynamics.The ISME journal · 2026Article
- Community coalescence reveals strong selection and coexistence within species in complex microbial communities.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Competition for shared resources increases dependence on initial population size during coalescence of gut microbial communities.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Habitat filtering more than microbiota origin controls microbiome transplant outcomes in soil.The ISME journal · 2025Article
- Towards a mathematical understanding of invasion resistance in multispecies communities.Royal Society open science · 2023Article
- The ecology of scale: impact of volume on coalescence and function in methanogenic communities.Interface focus · 2023Article
- Experimental community coalescence sheds light on microbial interactions in soil and restores impaired functions.Microbiome · 2023Article
- Ecosystem Microbiome Science.mLife · 2023Article
- Ecological Drivers of Community Cohesion.mSystems · 2023Article
- Ecological landscapes guide the assembly of optimal microbial communities.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Whole community invasions and the integration of novel ecosystems.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Top-down and bottom-up cohesiveness in microbial community coalescence.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- Closed microbial communities self-organize to persistently cycle carbon.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021Article
- The role of competition versus cooperation in microbial community coalescence.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Eco-Evolutionary Dynamics in Microbial Communities from Spontaneous Fermented Foods.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- The impact of propagule pressure on whole community invasions in biomethane-producing communities.iScience · 2021Article
- Directed Evolution of Microbial Communities.Annual review of biophysics · 2021Review
- Constrained proteome allocation affects coexistence in models of competitive microbial communities.The ISME journal · 2021Article
- Multi-Replicated Enrichment Communities as a Model System in Microbial Ecology.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent work draws attention to community-community encounters ('coalescence') as likely an important factor shaping natural ecosystems. This work builds on MacArthur's classic model of competitive coexistence to investigate such community-level competition in a minimal theoretical setting. It is shown that the ability of a species to survive a coalescence event is best predicted by a community-level 'fitness' of its native community rather than the intrinsic performance of the species itself. The model presented here allows formalizing a macroscopic perspective whereby a community harboring organisms at varying abundances becomes equivalent to a single organism expressing genes at different levels. While most natural communities do not satisfy the strict criteria of multicellularity developed by multi-level selection theory, the effective cohesion described here is a generic consequence of resource partitioning, requires no cooperative interactions, and can be expected to be widespread in microbial ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.