ArticleJournal of natural products2016
Maximiscin Induces DNA Damage, Activates DNA Damage Response Pathways, and Has Selective Cytotoxic Activity against a Subtype of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
Article in Journal of natural products, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anticancer Secondary Metabolites Produced by Fungi: Potential and Representative Compounds.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Selective Antineoplastic Potential of Fractionated Caribbean NativePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Synthetic and Naturally Occurring Heterocyclic Anticancer Compounds with Multiple Biological Targets.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Bioactive Abietane-Type Diterpenoid Glycosides from Leaves ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- An Integrated Strategy for the Detection, Dereplication, and Identification of DNA-Binding Biomolecules from Complex Natural Product Mixtures.Journal of natural products · 2021Article
- Ideality in Context: Motivations for Total Synthesis.Accounts of chemical research · 2021Article
- CRISPR-Cas9 Genome-Wide Knockout Screen Identifies Mechanism of Selective Activity of Dehydrofalcarinol in Mesenchymal Stem-like Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells.Journal of natural products · 2020Article
- Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells Exhibit Differential Sensitivity to Cardenolides fromJournal of natural products · 2020Article
- Total Synthesis of (-)-Maximiscin.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2020Article
- Triple-negative breast cancer cell line sensitivity to englerin A identifies a new, targetable subtype.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2019Article
- Biochemical and Anti-Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Tumor Cell Properties of Psammaplins.Marine drugs · 2018Article
- The "Yin and Yang" of Natural Compounds in Anticancer Therapy of Triple-Negative Breast Cancers.Cancers · 2018Review
- Diterpenoid natural compound C4 (Crassin) exerts cytostatic effects on triple-negative breast cancer cells via a pathway involving reactive oxygen species.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancers are highly aggressive, and patients with these types of tumors have poor long-term survival. These breast cancers do not express estrogen or progesterone receptors and do not have gene amplification of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; therefore, they do not respond to available targeted therapies. The lack of targeted therapies for triple-negative breast cancers stems from their heterogeneous nature and lack of a clear definition of driver defects. Studies have recently identified triple-negative breast cancer molecular subtypes based on gene expression profiling and representative cell lines, allowing for the identification of subtype-specific drug leads and molecular targets. We previously reported the identification of a new fungal metabolite named maximiscin (1) identified through a crowdsourcing program. New results show that 1 has selective cytotoxic efficacy against basal-like 1 MDA-MB-468 cells compared to cell lines modeling other triple-negative breast cancer molecular subtypes. This compound also exhibited antitumor efficacy in a xenograft mouse model. The mechanisms of action of 1 in MDA-MB-468 cells were investigated to identify potential molecular targets and affected pathways. Compound 1 caused accumulation of cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, suggesting induction of DNA damage. Indeed, treatment with 1 caused DNA double-strand breaks with concomitant activation of the DNA damage response pathways, indicated by phosphorylation of p53, Chk1, and Chk2. Collectively, these results suggest basal-like triple-negative breast cancer may be inherently sensitive to DNA-damaging agents relative to other triple-negative breast cancer subtypes. These results also demonstrate the potential of our citizen crowdsourcing program to identify new lead molecules for treating the subtypes of triple-negative breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.