Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27310263›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2016

Generation of meiomaps of genome-wide recombination and chromosome segregation in human oocytes.

Christian S Ottolini, Antonio Capalbo, Louise Newnham, Danilo Cimadomo, Senthilkumar A Natesan, Eva R Hoffmann, Filippo M Ubaldi, Laura Rienzi, Alan H Handyside

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Molecular basis of reproductive senescence: insights from model organisms.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The impact of recombination on human mutation load and disease.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Christian S OttoliniThe Bridge Centre, London, UK.
Antonio CapalboGENERA, Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy.
Louise NewnhamGenome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Danilo CimadomoGENERA, Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy.
Senthilkumar A NatesanIllumina, Cambridge, UK.
Eva R HoffmannGenome Damage and Stability Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Filippo M UbaldiGENERA, Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy.
Laura RienziGENERA, Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy.
Alan H HandysideThe Bridge Centre, London, UK.
Clinica Valle Giulia · ITIllumina (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Sussex · GBUniversity of Kent · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have developed a protocol for the generation of genome-wide maps (meiomaps) of recombination and chromosome segregation for the three products of human female meiosis: the first and second polar bodies (PB1 and PB2) and the corresponding oocyte. PB1 is biopsied and the oocyte is artificially activated by exposure to calcium ionophore, after which PB2 is biopsied and collected with the corresponding oocyte. The whole genomes of the polar bodies and oocytes are amplified by multiple displacement amplification and, together with maternal genomic DNA, genotyped for ∼300,000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) genome-wide by microarray. Informative maternal heterozygous SNPs are phased using a haploid PB2 or oocyte as a reference. A simple algorithm is then used to identify the maternal haplotypes for each chromosome, in all of the products of meiosis for each oocyte. This allows mapping of crossovers and analysis of chromosome segregation patterns. The protocol takes a minimum of 3-5 d and requires a clinical embryologist with micromanipulation experience and a molecular biologist with basic bioinformatic skills. It has several advantages over previous methods; importantly, the use of artificial oocyte activation avoids the creation of embryos for research purposes. In addition, compared with next-generation sequencing, targeted SNP genotyping is cost-effective and it simplifies the bioinformatic analysis, as only one haploid reference sample is required to establish phase for maternal haplotyping. Finally, meiomapping is more informative than copy-number analysis alone for analysis of chromosome segregation patterns. Using this protocol, we have provided new insights that may lead to improvements in assisted reproduction for the treatment of infertility.

Indexed as

Chromosome SegregationMeiosisAdultChromosome MappingFemaleGenome, HumanGenotypeGenotyping TechniquesHaplotypesHumansOocytesPolar BodiesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRecombination, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID27310263
OpenAlexW2437442044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.