Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27310062›Full record

ArticleNeuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society2016

An Investigation of Feasibility and Safety of Bi-Modal Stimulation for the Treatment of Tinnitus: An Open-Label Pilot Study.

Caroline Hamilton, Shona D'Arcy, Barak A Pearlmutter, Gloria Crispino, Edmund C Lalor, Brendan J Conlon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Caroline HamiltonBrain and Computation Lab, National University of Ireland Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland.
Shona D'ArcyStatistica Medica, Dublin, Ireland.
Barak A PearlmutterBrain and Computation Lab, National University of Ireland Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland.
Gloria CrispinoStatistica Medica, Dublin, Ireland.
Edmund C LalorNeural-Engineering, School of Engineering, Trinity College Institute of Neuroscience and Trinity Centre for Bioengineering, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Brendan J ConlonENT Department, Hermitage Medical Centre, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTinnitus is the perception of sound in the absence of an external auditory stimulus. It is widely believed that tinnitus, in patients with associated hearing loss, is a neurological phenomenon primarily affecting the central auditory structures. However, there is growing evidence for the involvement of the somatosensory system in this form of tinnitus. For this reason it has been suggested that the condition may be amenable to bi-modal stimulation of the auditory and somatosensory systems. We conducted a pilot study to investigate the feasibility and safety of a device that delivers simultaneous auditory and somatosensory stimulation to treat the symptoms of chronic tinnitus.

methodsA cohort of 54 patients used the stimulation device for 10 weeks. Auditory stimulation was delivered via headphones and somatosensory stimulation was delivered via electrical stimulation of the tongue. Patient usage, logged by the device, was used to classify patients as compliant or noncompliant. Safety was assessed by reported adverse events and changes in tinnitus outcome measures. Response to treatment was assessed using tinnitus outcome measures: Minimum Masking Level (MML), Tinnitus Loudness Matching (TLM), and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI).

resultsThe device was well tolerated by patients and no adverse events or serious difficulties using the device were reported. Overall, 68% of patients met the defined compliance threshold. Compliant patients (N = 30) demonstrated statistically significant improvements in mean outcome measures after 10 weeks of treatment: THI (-11.7 pts, p < 0.001), TLM (-7.5dB, p < 0.001), and MML (-9.7dB, p < 0.001). The noncompliant group (N = 14) demonstrated no statistical improvements.

conclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility and safety of a new bi-modal stimulation device and supports the potential efficacy of this new treatment for tinnitus.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhysical StimulationPilot ProjectsTinnitusTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAuditory somatosensory stimulationneuromodulationtinnitus

Identifiers

PMID27310062
PMCPMC5157761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.