Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27309962›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2016

Integration and Fixation Preferences of Human and Mouse Endogenous Retroviruses Uncovered with Functional Data Analysis.

Rebeca Campos-Sánchez, Marzia A Cremona, Alessia Pini, Francesca Chiaromonte, Kateryna D Makova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Functional data analysis for computational biology.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rebeca Campos-SánchezGenetics Graduate Program, The Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Marzia A CremonaMOX-Modeling and Scientific Computing, Department of Mathematics, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8899-7316
Alessia PiniMOX-Modeling and Scientific Computing, Department of Mathematics, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.
Francesca ChiaromonteDepartment of Statistics, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Kateryna D MakovaCenter for Medical Genomics, The Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Penn State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Pennsylvania State University · USPolitecnico di Milano · IT

Funding

Computational and Biochemical Analysis of Microsatellite Life CycleR01GM087472 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI ECKERT, KRISTIN A, MAKOVA, KATERYNA · 2009 to 2012
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM087472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endogenous retroviruses (ERVs), the remnants of retroviral infections in the germ line, occupy ~8% and ~10% of the human and mouse genomes, respectively, and affect their structure, evolution, and function. Yet we still have a limited understanding of how the genomic landscape influences integration and fixation of ERVs. Here we conducted a genome-wide study of the most recently active ERVs in the human and mouse genome. We investigated 826 fixed and 1,065 in vitro HERV-Ks in human, and 1,624 fixed and 242 polymorphic ETns, as well as 3,964 fixed and 1,986 polymorphic IAPs, in mouse. We quantitated >40 human and mouse genomic features (e.g., non-B DNA structure, recombination rates, and histone modifications) in ±32 kb of these ERVs' integration sites and in control regions, and analyzed them using Functional Data Analysis (FDA) methodology. In one of the first applications of FDA in genomics, we identified genomic scales and locations at which these features display their influence, and how they work in concert, to provide signals essential for integration and fixation of ERVs. The investigation of ERVs of different evolutionary ages (young in vitro and polymorphic ERVs, older fixed ERVs) allowed us to disentangle integration vs. fixation preferences. As a result of these analyses, we built a comprehensive model explaining the uneven distribution of ERVs along the genome. We found that ERVs integrate in late-replicating AT-rich regions with abundant microsatellites, mirror repeats, and repressive histone marks. Regions favoring fixation are depleted of genes and evolutionarily conserved elements, and have low recombination rates, reflecting the effects of purifying selection and ectopic recombination removing ERVs from the genome. In addition to providing these biological insights, our study demonstrates the power of exploiting multiple scales and localization with FDA. These powerful techniques are expected to be applicable to many other genomic investigations.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromosome MappingComputational BiologyData Interpretation, StatisticalDNA ReplicationEndogenous RetrovirusesEpigenesis, GeneticGenome, HumanHumansLogistic ModelsMiceModels, BiologicalRecombination, GeneticRepetitive Sequences, Nucleic AcidSelection, GeneticVirus Integration

Identifiers

PMID27309962
PMCPMC4911145
OpenAlexW2431496707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.