Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27309621›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2016

Electrical Microstimulation of the Superior Colliculus in Strabismic Monkeys.

Jérome Fleuriet, Mark M G Walton, Seiji Ono, Michael J Mustari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Saccade Strategy in Alternating Exotropia.Shinkei ganka = Neuro-ophthalmology Japan · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Neural Plasticity Following Surgical Correction of Strabismus in Monkeys.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2018
    Article
  13. Normal Topography and Binocularity of the Superior Colliculus in Strabismus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Childhood Onset Strabismus: A Neurotrophic Factor Hypothesis.Journal of binocular vision and ocular motility
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jérome FleurietWashington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States 2Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Mark M G WaltonWashington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States.
Seiji OnoFaculty of Health and Sport Science, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Michael J MustariWashington National Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States 2Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States 4Department of Biological Structure, University of Washing.
University of Washington · USUniversity of Tsukuba · JP

Funding

Washington National Primate Research CenterP51OD010425 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mari Ostendorf · 2012 to 2026
$201.8M
Visual Processing and Smooth Eye MovementsR01EY006069 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MUSTARI, MICHAEL J · 1986 to 2018
$6.4M
Brainstem Saccade Circuitry in StrabismusR01EY024248 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WALTON, MARK M · 2015 to 2023
$4.2M
Neural mechanisms for smooth pursuit adaptationR01EY019266 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ONO, SEIJI · 2008 to 2013
$1.7M
Mobile App for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening using Cellphone Retinal CameraR43EY024848 · NEI · EYENUK, INC. · PI SOLANKI, KAUSHAL · 2014 to 2014
$217k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY006069NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019266NEI NIH HHS R01 EY024248NEI NIH HHS R43 EY024848NIH HHS P51 OD010425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVisually guided saccades are disconjugate in human and nonhuman strabismic primates. The superior colliculus (SC) is a region of the brain topographically organized in visual and motor maps where the saccade goal is spatially coded. The present study was designed to investigate if a site of stimulation on the topographic motor map was evoking similar or different saccade vectors for each eye.

methodsWe used microelectrical stimulation (MS) of the SC in two strabismic (one esotrope and one exotrope) and two control macaques under binocular and monocular viewing conditions. We compared the saccade amplitudes and directions for each SC site and each condition independently of the fixating eye and then between each fixating eye. A comparison with disconjugacies of visually guided saccades was also performed.

resultsWe observed different saccade vectors for the two eyes in strabismic monkeys, but conjugate saccades in normal monkeys. Evoked saccade vectors for the left eye when that eye was fixating the target were different from those of the right eye when it was fixating. The disconjugacies evoked by the MS were not identical but similar to those observed for visually guided saccades especially for the dominant eye.

conclusionsOur results suggest that, in strabismus, the saccade generator does not interpret activation of a single location of the SC as the same desired displacement for each eye. This finding is important for advancing understanding of the development of neural circuits in strabismus. French Abstract.

Indexed as

MicroelectrodesAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalElectric Stimulation TherapyEye MovementsFemaleMacaca mulattaMaleStrabismusSuperior ColliculiTreatment OutcomeVision, Binocular

Identifiers

PMID27309621
PMCPMC4928695
OpenAlexW2426171071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.