Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27309527›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Chloroplast DNA Structural Variation, Phylogeny, and Age of Divergence among Diploid Cotton Species.

Zhiwen Chen, Kun Feng, Corrinne E Grover, Pengbo Li, Fang Liu, Yumei Wang, Qin Xu, Mingzhao Shang, Zhongli Zhou, Xiaoyan Cai and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Features of Chromosome Introgression fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Chloroplast Genomes of GenusFrontiers in genetics · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Horizontal Gene Transfer Involving Chloroplasts.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Complete Chloroplast Genomes ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. TheG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zhiwen ChenDepartment of Plant Genetics and Breeding/Key Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization of Ministry of Education/Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Kun FengState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, Henan, China.
Corrinne E GroverDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, United States of America.
Pengbo LiDepartment of Plant Genetics and Breeding/Key Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization of Ministry of Education/Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Fang LiuState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, Henan, China.
Yumei WangDepartment of Plant Genetics and Breeding/Key Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization of Ministry of Education/Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Qin XuDepartment of Plant Genetics and Breeding/Key Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization of Ministry of Education/Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Mingzhao ShangState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, Henan, China.
Zhongli ZhouState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, Henan, China.
Xiaoyan CaiState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, Henan, China.
Xingxing WangState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, Henan, China.
Jonathan F WendelDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, United States of America.
Kunbo WangState Key Laboratory of Cotton Biology, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Anyang 455000, Henan, China.
Jinping HuaDepartment of Plant Genetics and Breeding/Key Laboratory of Crop Heterosis and Utilization of Ministry of Education/Beijing Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4110-8179
Cotton Research Institute · CNChina Agricultural University · CNIowa State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cotton genus (Gossypium spp.) contains 8 monophyletic diploid genome groups (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, K) and a single allotetraploid clade (AD). To gain insight into the phylogeny of Gossypium and molecular evolution of the chloroplast genome in this group, we performed a comparative analysis of 19 Gossypium chloroplast genomes, six reported here for the first time. Nucleotide distance in non-coding regions was about three times that of coding regions. As expected, distances were smaller within than among genome groups. Phylogenetic topologies based on nucleotide and indel data support for the resolution of the 8 genome groups into 6 clades. Phylogenetic analysis of indel distribution among the 19 genomes demonstrates contrasting evolutionary dynamics in different clades, with a parallel genome downsizing in two genome groups and a biased accumulation of insertions in the clade containing the cultivated cottons leading to large (for Gossypium) chloroplast genomes. Divergence time estimates derived from the cpDNA sequence suggest that the major diploid clades had diverged approximately 10 to 11 million years ago. The complete nucleotide sequences of 6 cpDNA genomes are provided, offering a resource for cytonuclear studies in Gossypium.

Indexed as

DiploidyINDEL MutationPhylogenyChloroplastsDNA, ChloroplastDNA Copy Number VariationsGenetic SpeciationGenome, ChloroplastGossypiumOpen Reading FramesSequence Analysis, DNATetraploidyDNA, Chloroplast

Identifiers

PMID27309527
PMCPMC4911064
OpenAlexW2431605287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.