Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27308830›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Src Is a Potential Therapeutic Target in Endocrine-Resistant Breast Cancer Exhibiting Low Estrogen Receptor-Mediated Transactivation.

Stephanie K Guest, Ricardo Ribas, Sunil Pancholi, Joanna Nikitorowicz-Buniak, Nikiana Simigdala, Mitch Dowsett, Stephen R Johnston, Lesley-Ann Martin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Stephanie K GuestThe Breast Cancer Now and Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Ricardo RibasThe Breast Cancer Now and Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Sunil PancholiThe Breast Cancer Now and Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Joanna Nikitorowicz-BuniakThe Breast Cancer Now and Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Nikiana SimigdalaThe Breast Cancer Now and Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Mitch DowsettThe Breast Cancer Now and Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Stephen R JohnstonRoyal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Lesley-Ann MartinThe Breast Cancer Now and Toby Robins Research Centre, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.
Institute of Cancer Research · GBBreast Cancer Now · GBRoyal Marsden Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the effectiveness of endocrine therapies in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer, approximately 40% of patients relapse. Previously, we identified the Focal-adhesion kinase canonical pathway as a major contributor of resistance to estrogen deprivation and cellular-sarcoma kinase (c-src) as a dominant gene in this pathway. Dasatinib, a pan-src inhibitor, has recently been used in clinical trials to treat ER+ patients but has shown mixed success. In the following study, using isogenic cell line models, we provide a potential explanation for these findings and suggest a sub-group that may benefit. A panel of isogenic cell lines modelling resistance to aromatase inhibitors (LTED) and tamoxifen (TAMR) were assessed for response to dasatinib ± endocrine therapy. Dasatinib caused a dose-dependent decrease in proliferation in MCF7-TAMR cells and resensitized them to tamoxifen and fulvestrant but not in HCC1428-TAMR. In contrast, in estrogen-deprived conditions, dasatinib increased the proliferation rate of parental-MCF7 cells and had no effect on MCF7-LTED or HCC1428-LTED. Treatment with dasatinib caused a decrease in src-phosphorylation and inhibition of downstream pathways, including AKT and ERK1/2 in all cell lines tested, but only the MCF7-TAMR showed a concomitant decrease in markers of cell cycle progression. Inhibition of src also caused a significant decrease in cell migration in both MCF7-LTED and MCF7-TAMR cells. Finally, we showed that, in MCF7-TAMR cells, in contrast to tamoxifen sensitive cell lines, ER is expressed throughout the cell rather than being restricted to the nucleus and that treatment with dasatinib resulted in nuclear shuttling of ER, which was associated with an increase in ER-mediated transcription. These data suggest that src has differential effects in endocrine-resistant cell lines, particularly in tamoxifen resistant models, with low ER genomic activity, providing further evidence of the importance of patient selection for clinical trials testing dasatinib utility in ER+ breast cancer.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationCSK Tyrosine-Protein KinaseDasatinibDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEstradiolFemaleFulvestrantHumansMCF-7 CellsMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalCSK protein, humanCSK Tyrosine-Protein KinaseDasatinibEstradiolFulvestrantMAPK1 protein, humanMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktReceptors, Estrogensrc-Family KinasesTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID27308830
PMCPMC4911087
OpenAlexW2420560209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.