Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27308424›Full record

ReviewMolecular & cellular oncology

Caenorhabditis elegans as a model for cancer research.

Emmanouil Kyriakakis, Maria Markaki, Nektarios Tavernarakis

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular & cellular oncology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Beyond Rodents: Alternative Animal Models in Colorectal Cancer Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Emmanouil KyriakakisInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology; Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas.
Maria MarkakiInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology; Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas.
Nektarios TavernarakisInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology; Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas; Department of Basic Sciences; Faculty of Medicine; University of Crete Heraklion; Crete, Greece.
Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas · GRInstitute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology · BGUniversity of Crete · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term cancer describes a group of multifaceted diseases characterized by an intricate pathophysiology. Despite significant advances in the fight against cancer, it remains a key public health concern and burden on societies worldwide. Elucidation of key molecular and cellular mechanisms of oncogenic diseases will facilitate the development of better intervention strategies to counter or prevent tumor development. In vivo and in vitro models have long been used to delineate distinct biological processes involved in cancer such as apoptosis, proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion, metastasis, genome instability, and metabolism. In this review, we introduce Caenorhabditis elegans as an emerging animal model for systematic dissection of the molecular basis of tumorigenesis, focusing on the well-established processes of apoptosis and autophagy. Additionally, we propose that C. elegans can be used to advance our understanding of cancer progression, such as deregulation of energy metabolism, stem cell reprogramming, and host-microflora interactions.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis eleganscancercancer stem cellscell deathcellular energeticsgenome instabilityhost-microbe interactionstumor

Identifiers

PMID27308424
PMCPMC4905018
OpenAlexW2316271006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.