Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27307733›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2016

In vivo biodistribution, biocompatibility, and efficacy of sorafenib-loaded lipid-based nanosuspensions evaluated experimentally in cancer.

Shaomei Yang, Bo Zhang, Xiaowei Gong, Tianqi Wang, Yongjun Liu, Na Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sorafenib and Piperine co-loaded PLGA nanoparticles: Development, characterization, and anti-cancer activity against hepatocellular carcinoma cell line.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Aptamer-mediated hollow MnODrug delivery · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Shaomei YangDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Bo ZhangDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Xiaowei GongShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Neuroprotective Drug, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Tianqi WangDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Yongjun LiuDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Na ZhangDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.
Shandong University · CNAmerican Pharmacists Association · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. In this study, sorafenib-loaded lipid-based nanosuspensions (sorafenib-LNS) were first developed as an intravenous injectable formulation to increase the efficacy of sorafenib against HCC. LNS were used as nanocarriers for sorafenib owing to their desired features in increasing the solubility and dissolution velocity, improving the bioavailability of sorafenib. Sorafenib-LNS were prepared by nanoprecipitation and consisted of spherical particles with a uniform size distribution (164.5 nm, polydispersity index =0.202) and negative zeta potential (-11.0 mV). The drug loading (DL) was 10.55%±0.16%. Sorafenib-LNS showed higher in vitro cytotoxicity than sorafenib against HepG2 cells (P<0.05) and Bel-7402 cells (P<0.05). The in vivo biodistribution, biocompatibility, and antitumor efficacy of sorafenib-LNS were evaluated in H22-bearing liver cancer xenograft murine model. The results showed that sorafenib-LNS (9 mg/kg) exhibited significantly higher antitumor efficacy by reducing the tumor volume compared with the sorafenib oral group (18 mg/kg, P<0.05) and sorafenib injection group (9 mg/kg, P<0.05). Furthermore, the results of the in vivo biodistribution experiments demonstrated that sorafenib-LNS injected into H22 tumor-bearing mice exhibited increased accumulation in the tumor tissue, which was confirmed by in vivo imaging. In the current experimental conditions, sorafenib-LNS did not show significant toxicity both in vitro and in vivo. These results suggest that sorafenib-LNS are a promising nanomedicine for treating HCC.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiocompatible MaterialsCarcinoma, HepatocellularCell DeathCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalDrug LiberationFemaleHemolysisHumansInhibitory Concentration 50LipidsLiver NeoplasmsMiceAntineoplastic AgentsBiocompatible MaterialsLipidsNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsSorafenibSuspensionsantitumor effectdistributionHCClipid-based nanosuspensionssorafenib

Identifiers

PMID27307733
PMCPMC4887074
OpenAlexW2397808992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.