Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27307728›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2016

Silica nanoparticles induce reversible damage of spermatogenic cells via RIPK1 signal pathways in C57 mice.

Lihua Ren, Jin Zhang, Yang Zou, Lianshuang Zhang, Jialiu Wei, Zhixiong Shi, Yanbo Li, Caixia Guo, Zhiwei Sun, Xianqing Zhou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The effect of SiNPs on DNA methylation of genome in mouse spermatocytes.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  12. Mechanisms and pathogenesis underlying environmental chemical-induced necroptosis.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. LaInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lihua RenDepartment of Toxicology and Hygienic Chemistry, School of Public Health, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jin ZhangDepartment of Toxicology and Hygienic Chemistry, School of Public Health, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yang ZouDepartment of Toxicology and Hygienic Chemistry, School of Public Health, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Lianshuang ZhangDepartment of Toxicology and Hygienic Chemistry, School of Public Health, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jialiu WeiDepartment of Toxicology and Hygienic Chemistry, School of Public Health, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zhixiong ShiDepartment of Toxicology and Hygienic Chemistry, School of Public Health, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yanbo LiDepartment of Toxicology and Hygienic Chemistry, School of Public Health, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Caixia GuoBeijing Key Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zhiwei SunDepartment of Toxicology and Hygienic Chemistry, School of Public Health, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xianqing ZhouDepartment of Toxicology and Hygienic Chemistry, School of Public Health, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Beijing Key Laboratory of Environmental Toxicology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Faculty of Public Health · GBCapital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The reproductive toxicity of silica nanoparticles (SiNPs) is well known, but the underlying mechanism is still not clear. To investigate the toxic mechanism of SiNPs on spermatogenic cells, 60 C57 male mice were randomly and equally divided into three groups (the control group, the saline control group, and the SiNPs group) with two observed time points (45 days and 75 days). The mice in the SiNPs group were administered with SiNPs 2 mg/kg diluted in normal saline, and the mice of the saline control group were given equivoluminal normal saline by tracheal perfusion every 3 days for 45 days (in total 15 times). The control group mice were bred without treatment. In each group, a half number of the mice were sacrificed on the 45th day after the first dose, and the remaining half were sacrificed on the 75th day. The results showed that SiNPs increased the malformation of sperms and decreased the motility and concentration of sperms in epididymis on the 45th day after the first dose. SiNPs induced oxidative stress in testis and led to apoptosis and necroptosis of the spermatogenic cells. Furthermore, SiNPs increased the expression of Fas/FasL/RIPK1/FADD/caspase-8/caspase-3 and RIPK3/MLKL on the 45th day after the first dose. However, compared with the saline control group, the index of sperms and the expression of Fas/FasL/RIPK1/FADD/caspase-8/caspase-3/RIPK3/MLKL showed no significant changes in the SiNPs group on the 75th day after the first dose. These data suggested that SiNPs could induce apoptosis and necroptosis in the spermatogenic cells by activating the RIPK1 pathway resulting from oxidative stress in male mice. SiNPs-induced damage recovered on the 75th day after the first dose, which suggested that SiNPs-induced toxicity is reversible.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisCaspase 3Caspase 8MaleMice, Inbred C57BLNanoparticlesOxidative StressReceptor-Interacting Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesSignal TransductionSilicon DioxideSpermatozoaTestisToxicity TestsCaspase 3Caspase 8Receptor-Interacting Protein Serine-Threonine KinasesRipk1 protein, mouseRipk3 protein, mouseSilicon DioxideapoptosisnecroptosisreversibleRIPK1 signal pathwaysilica nanoparticlesspermatogenic cells

Identifiers

PMID27307728
PMCPMC4887058
OpenAlexW2395482330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.