ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016
Jumping across biomedical contexts using compressive data fusion.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing precision medicine in axial spondyloarthritis: insights from multi-omics approaches.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- WormTensor: a clustering method for time-series whole-brain activity data from C. elegans.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- HetIG-PreDiG: A Heterogeneous Integrated Graph Model for Predicting Human Disease Genes based on gene expression.PloS one · 2023Article
- Machine learning: its challenges and opportunities in plant system biology.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Unsupervised Multi-Omics Data Integration Methods: A Comprehensive Review.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Review
- Machine Learning for Integrating Data in Biology and Medicine: Principles, Practice, and Opportunities.An international journal on information fusion · 2019Article
- Fast optimization of non-negative matrix tri-factorization.PloS one · 2019Article
- Large-scale analysis of disease pathways in the human interactome.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationThe rapid growth of diverse biological data allows us to consider interactions between a variety of objects, such as genes, chemicals, molecular signatures, diseases, pathways and environmental exposures. Often, any pair of objects-such as a gene and a disease-can be related in different ways, for example, directly via gene-disease associations or indirectly via functional annotations, chemicals and pathways. Different ways of relating these objects carry different semantic meanings However, traditional methods disregard these semantics and thus cannot fully exploit their value in data modeling.
resultsWe present Medusa, an approach to detect size-k modules of objects that, taken together, appear most significant to another set of objects. Medusa operates on large-scale collections of heterogeneous datasets and explicitly distinguishes between diverse data semantics. It advances research along two dimensions: it builds on collective matrix factorization to derive different semantics, and it formulates the growing of the modules as a submodular optimization program. Medusa is flexible in choosing or combining semantic meanings and provides theoretical guarantees about detection quality. In a systematic study on 310 complex diseases, we show the effectiveness of Medusa in associating genes with diseases and detecting disease modules. We demonstrate that in predicting gene-disease associations Medusa compares favorably to methods that ignore diverse semantic meanings. We find that the utility of different semantics depends on disease categories and that, overall, Medusa recovers disease modules more accurately when combining different semantics. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code is at http://github.com/marinkaz/medusa CONTACT: marinka@cs.stanford.edu, blaz.zupan@fri.uni-lj.si.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.