ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016
RCK: accurate and efficient inference of sequence- and structure-based protein-RNA binding models from RNAcompete data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- A resource of RNA-binding protein motifs across eukaryotes reveals evolutionary dynamics and gene-regulatory function.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Augmented prediction of multi-species protein-RNA interactions using evolutionary conservation of RNA-binding proteins.Nature communications · 2026Article
- PRIME-BSPre: a genome-wide protein-RNA binding sites prediction method based on templates.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- EPIFBMC: A New Model for Enhancer-Promoter Interaction Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Evaluation of novel computational methods to identify RNA-binding protein footprints from structural data.RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- rbpTransformer: A novel deep learning model for prediction of piRNA and mRNA bindings.PloS one · 2025Article
- DeepFusion: A deep bimodal information fusion network for unraveling protein-RNA interactions using in vivo RNA structures.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- iCRBP-LKHA: Large convolutional kernel and hybrid channel-spatial attention for identifying circRNA-RBP interaction sites.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- CircSI-SSL: circRNA-binding site identification based on self-supervised learning.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- KDeep: a new memory-efficient data extraction method for accurately predicting DNA/RNA transcription factor binding sites.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- PrismNet: predicting protein-RNA interaction using in vivo RNA structural information.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- CircSSNN: circRNA-binding site prediction via sequence self-attention neural networks with pre-normalization.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- ResidualBind: Uncovering Sequence-Structure Preferences of RNA-Binding Proteins with Deep Neural Networks.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- PRIESSTESS: interpretable, high-performing models of the sequence and structure preferences of RNA-binding proteins.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- RNANetMotif: Identifying sequence-structure RNA network motifs in RNA-protein binding sites.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Protein-RNA interaction prediction with deep learning: structure matters.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence methods enhance the discovery of RNA interactions.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
- Computational tools to study RNA-protein complexes.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022Review
- Multi-resBind: a residual network-based multi-label classifier for in vivo RNA binding prediction and preference visualization.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
motivationProtein-RNA interactions, which play vital roles in many processes, are mediated through both RNA sequence and structure. CLIP-based methods, which measure protein-RNA binding in vivo, suffer from experimental noise and systematic biases, whereas in vitro experiments capture a clearer signal of protein RNA-binding. Among them, RNAcompete provides binding affinities of a specific protein to more than 240 000 unstructured RNA probes in one experiment. The computational challenge is to infer RNA structure- and sequence-based binding models from these data. The state-of-the-art in sequence models, Deepbind, does not model structural preferences. RNAcontext models both sequence and structure preferences, but is outperformed by GraphProt. Unfortunately, GraphProt cannot detect structural preferences from RNAcompete data due to the unstructured nature of the data, as noted by its developers, nor can it be tractably run on the full RNACompete dataset.
resultsWe develop RCK, an efficient, scalable algorithm that infers both sequence and structure preferences based on a new k-mer based model. Remarkably, even though RNAcompete data is designed to be unstructured, RCK can still learn structural preferences from it. RCK significantly outperforms both RNAcontext and Deepbind in in vitro binding prediction for 244 RNAcompete experiments. Moreover, RCK is also faster and uses less memory, which enables scalability. While currently on par with existing methods in in vivo binding prediction on a small scale test, we demonstrate that RCK will increasingly benefit from experimentally measured RNA structure profiles as compared to computationally predicted ones. By running RCK on the entire RNAcompete dataset, we generate and provide as a resource a set of protein-RNA structure-based models on an unprecedented scale. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Software and models are freely available at http://rck.csail.mit.edu/ CONTACT: bab@mit.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.