ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016
Finding correct protein-protein docking models using ProQDock.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed.
- TINA: a geometry-aware post-hoc scoring framework for protein-protein interaction.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2026Article
- Molecular basis of pyruvate transport and inhibition of the human mitochondrial pyruvate carrier.Science advances · 2025Article
- A comprehensive survey of scoring functions for protein docking models.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Recent advances and challenges in protein complex model accuracy estimation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Review
- DockQ v2: improved automatic quality measure for protein multimers, nucleic acids, and small molecules.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- A Survey of Deep Learning Methods for Estimating the Accuracy of Protein Quaternary Structure Models.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- Modified host defence peptide GF19 slows TNT-mediated spread of corneal herpes simplex virus serotype I infection.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- EnCPdock: a web-interface for direct conjoint comparative analyses of complementarity and binding energetics in inter-protein associations.Journal of molecular modeling · 2023Article
- A gated graph transformer for protein complex structure quality assessment and its performance in CASP15.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Phosphorylcholine and KR12-Containing Corneal Implants in HSV-1-Infected Rabbit Corneas.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- MetaScore: A Novel Machine-Learning-Based Approach to Improve Traditional Scoring Functions for Scoring Protein-Protein Docking Conformations.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- GDockScore: a graph-based protein-protein docking scoring function.Bioinformatics advances · 2023Article
- Functional antibody characterization via direct structural analysis and information-driven protein-protein docking.Proteins · 2022Article
- Article
- Improving peptide-protein docking with AlphaFold-Multimer using forced sampling.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Virus-receptor interactions of SARS-CoV-2 spikereceptor-binding domain and human neuropilin-1 b1 domain.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2021Article
- MAP4K4 expression in cardiomyocytes: multiple isoforms, multiple phosphorylations and interactions with striatins.The Biochemical journal · 2021Article
- Plausible blockers of Spike RBD in SARS-CoV2-molecular design and underlying interaction dynamics from high-level structural descriptors.Journal of molecular modeling · 2021Article
- InterPepRank: Assessment of Docked Peptide Conformations by a Deep Graph Network.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2021Review
- Improved cluster ranking in protein-protein docking using a regression approach.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationProtein-protein interactions are a key in virtually all biological processes. For a detailed understanding of the biological processes, the structure of the protein complex is essential. Given the current experimental techniques for structure determination, the vast majority of all protein complexes will never be solved by experimental techniques. In lack of experimental data, computational docking methods can be used to predict the structure of the protein complex. A common strategy is to generate many alternative docking solutions (atomic models) and then use a scoring function to select the best. The success of the computational docking technique is, to a large degree, dependent on the ability of the scoring function to accurately rank and score the many alternative docking models.
resultsHere, we present ProQDock, a scoring function that predicts the absolute quality of docking model measured by a novel protein docking quality score (DockQ). ProQDock uses support vector machines trained to predict the quality of protein docking models using features that can be calculated from the docking model itself. By combining different types of features describing both the protein-protein interface and the overall physical chemistry, it was possible to improve the correlation with DockQ from 0.25 for the best individual feature (electrostatic complementarity) to 0.49 for the final version of ProQDock. ProQDock performed better than the state-of-the-art methods ZRANK and ZRANK2 in terms of correlations, ranking and finding correct models on an independent test set. Finally, we also demonstrate that it is possible to combine ProQDock with ZRANK and ZRANK2 to improve performance even further. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: http://bioinfo.ifm.liu.se/ProQDock CONTACT: bjornw@ifm.liu.se SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.