ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2016
Comparative analyses of population-scale phenomic data in electronic medical records reveal race-specific disease networks.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Empirical assessment of bias in machine learning diagnostic test accuracy studies.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Pooled it
- The use of Electronic Health Records to Support Population Health: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Journal of medical systems · 2018Pooled it
- Applications of network analysis to routinely collected health care data: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018Pooled it
- Article
- Assessing the capture of sociodemographic information in electronic medical records to inform clinical decision making.PloS one · 2025Article
- Identification of population multimorbidity patterns in 3.9 million patients from Bogota in 2018.Global epidemiology · 2024Article
- Harnessing EHR data for health research.Nature medicine · 2024Review
- A global perspective on data powering responsible AI solutions in health applications.AI and ethics · 2023Article
- Similarities and differences in Alzheimer's dementia comorbidities in racialized populations identified from electronic medical records.Communications medicine · 2023Article
- Comorbidities and ethnic health disparities in the UK biobank.JAMIA open · 2022Article
- The effect of disease co-occurrence measurement on multimorbidity networks: a population-based study.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Article
- Cardiovascular informatics: building a bridge to data harmony.Cardiovascular research · 2022Review
- Deep phenotyping of Alzheimer's disease leveraging electronic medical records identifies sex-specific clinical associations.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Analysis of multimorbidity networks associated with different factors in Northeast China: a cross-sectional analysis.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Personalizing routine lab tests with machine learning.Nature medicine · 2021Article
- Characterisation, identification, clustering, and classification of disease.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Sensitivity of comorbidity network analysis.JAMIA open · 2020Article
- Integrative analysis of loss-of-function variants in clinical and genomic data reveals novel genes associated with cardiovascular traits.BMC medical genomics · 2019Article
- Potential Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms Using Electronic Health Record Data.JAMA internal medicine · 2018Article
- Precision global health and comorbidity: a population-based study of 16 357 people in rural Uganda.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationUnderrepresentation of racial groups represents an important challenge and major gap in phenomics research. Most of the current human phenomics research is based primarily on European populations; hence it is an important challenge to expand it to consider other population groups. One approach is to utilize data from EMR databases that contain patient data from diverse demographics and ancestries. The implications of this racial underrepresentation of data can be profound regarding effects on the healthcare delivery and actionability. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first attempt to perform comparative, population-scale analyses of disease networks across three different populations, namely Caucasian (EA), African American (AA) and Hispanic/Latino (HL).
resultsWe compared susceptibility profiles and temporal connectivity patterns for 1988 diseases and 37 282 disease pairs represented in a clinical population of 1 025 573 patients. Accordingly, we revealed appreciable differences in disease susceptibility, temporal patterns, network structure and underlying disease connections between EA, AA and HL populations. We found 2158 significantly comorbid diseases for the EA cohort, 3265 for AA and 672 for HL. We further outlined key disease pair associations unique to each population as well as categorical enrichments of these pairs. Finally, we identified 51 key 'hub' diseases that are the focal points in the race-centric networks and of particular clinical importance. Incorporating race-specific disease comorbidity patterns will produce a more accurate and complete picture of the disease landscape overall and could support more precise understanding of disease relationships and patient management towards improved clinical outcomes. CONTACTS: rong.chen@mssm.edu or joel.dudley@mssm.edu SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.