Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27307465›Full record

Trial reportScandinavian journal of public health2016

Reduction in sick leave by a workplace educational low back pain intervention: A cluster randomized controlled trial.

Eline Ree, Stein Atle Lie, Hege R Eriksen, Kirsti Malterud, Aage Indahl, Oddrun Samdal, Anette Harris

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scandinavian journal of public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The Effects of Workplace Interventions on Low Back Pain in Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Should musicians play in pain?British journal of pain · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eline ReeUni Research Health, Uni Research, Norway Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Norway eline.ree@uni.no.
Stein Atle LieDepartment of Clinical Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Bergen, Norway.
Hege R EriksenUni Research Health, Uni Research, Norway Department of Sport and Physical Activity, Bergen University College, Norway.
Kirsti MalterudUni Research Health, Uni Research, Norway Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway The Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
Aage IndahlDivision of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Norway.
Oddrun SamdalDepartment of Health Promotion and Development, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway.
Anette HarrisDepartment of Health Promotion and Development, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway Department of Psychosocial Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe aim of this study was to investigate whether a workplace educational low back pain intervention had an effect on sick leave at the individual level and to identify possible predictors of the effect of intervention.

methodsWork units in two municipalities were cluster randomized to (a) educational meetings and peer support (45 units), (b) educational meetings, peer support and access to an outpatient clinic if needed (48 units) or (c) a control group (42 units). Both intervention groups attended educational meetings with information about back pain based on a non-injury model. A peer adviser was selected from among their colleagues. The outcome was days of sick leave at the individual level at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, adjusting for previous sick leave at the unit level. As a result of similar effects on sick leave, the two intervention groups were merged (n=646) and compared with the control group (n=211). The predictors were different levels of belief in back pain myths, pain-related fear, helplessness/hopelessness and low back pain.

resultsThe intervention group had significantly less days of sick leave at the three month (4.9 days, p=0.001) and six month (4.4 days, p=0.016) follow ups compared with the control group. At three months, a low level of pain-related fear was the only predictor for the intervention effect (8.0 less days of sick leave, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS A WORKPLACE EDUCATIONAL BACK PAIN INTERVENTION HAD AN EFFECT ON SICK LEAVE FOR UP TO SIX MONTHS A LOW SCORE ON PAIN-RELATED FEAR WAS A PREDICTOR OF THE INTERVENTION EFFECT.

Indexed as

Health EducationOccupational Health ServicesAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultCluster AnalysisFearFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedOccupational DiseasesPeer GroupProgram Evaluationhealth communicationhealth educationhelplessnesshopelessnesslow back painpsychological adaptionsick leaveWork intervention

Identifiers

PMID27307465
PMCPMC4941097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.