Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27307462›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2016

Low Utility of Pediatric Isolator Blood Culture System for Detection of Fungemia in Children: a 10-Year Review.

Aaron Campigotto, Susan E Richardson, Michael Sebert, Erin McElvania TeKippe, Aparna Chakravarty, Christopher D Doern

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. First case of neonatal bloodstream infection caused byExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Medical mycology case reports · 2024
    Article
  3. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Aaron CampigottoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Susan E RichardsonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Division of Microbiology, Department of Paediatric Laboratory Medicine, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada susan.richardson@sickkids.ca.
Michael SebertDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Erin McElvania TeKippeDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA Department of Pathology, Children's Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Aparna ChakravartyDivision of Infectious Diseases, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christopher D DoernDepartment of Pathology, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
University of Toronto · CAChildren's Medical Center · USHospital for Sick Children · CAThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USVirginia Commonwealth University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of the Wampole Isolator 1.5-ml pediatric blood culture tube for the detection of fungemia in children was assessed by a 10-year retrospective review at two pediatric hospitals, The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, Canada, and the Children's Medical Center of Dallas, Texas. Over this period, a total of 9,442 pediatric Isolator specimens were processed, with yeast or yeast-like organisms recovered in 297 (3.1%) of the specimens (151 [1.6%] unique clinical episodes) and filamentous or dimorphic fungi recovered in 31 (0.3%) of the specimens (25 unique clinical episodes). Only 18 of the 151 clinical episodes of fungemia attributable to yeast were not detected by automated blood culture systems. The majority of isolated yeast were Candida spp., which were usually detected by automated systems, whereas the most common non-Candida yeast was Malassezia furfur, which the automated system failed to detect. Filamentous or dimorphic fungi were detected in 25 episodes, of which only 9 (36%) episodes were deemed clinically significant after chart review, indicating that in the majority of cases (16/25, 64%) fungal isolation represented contamination. In five of the nine clinically significant episodes, the isolated fungus (Histoplasma capsulatum, Coccidioides immitis/posadasii, Fusarium oxysporum, Aspergillus spp., and Bipolaris spp.) was also identified in other clinical specimens. Over the 10-year study period, the use of the pediatric Isolator system, at the discretion of the treating physician, only rarely provided useful clinical information for the diagnosis of fungemia in children, with the exception of M. furfur and possibly endemic mycoses.

Indexed as

AdolescentBlood CultureCanadaChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFungemiaFungiHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRetrospective StudiesSpecimen HandlingTexas

Identifiers

PMID27307462
PMCPMC5005482
OpenAlexW2436658791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.