Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27307458›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2016

Evaluation of a Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Detecting Major Bacterial Enteric Pathogens in Fecal Specimens: Intestinal Inflammation and Bacterial Load Are Correlated in Campylobacter Infections.

Nadia Wohlwend, Sacha Tiermann, Lorenz Risch, Martin Risch, Thomas Bodmer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Detection ofEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. How to Interpret a PositiveJournal of clinical medicine · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Campylobacter culture fails to correctly detect Campylobacter in 30% of positive patient stool specimens compared to non-cultural methods.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Impact of Culture-Independent Diagnostic Testing on Recovery of Enteric Bacterial Infections.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Observational
  14. Incidence ofGut pathogens · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Nadia Wohlwendlabormedizinisches zentrum Dr Risch, Bern-Liebefeld, Switzerland Private Universität im Fürstentum Liechtenstein, Triesen, Liechtenstein.
Sacha Tiermannlabormedizinisches zentrum Dr Risch, Bern-Liebefeld, Switzerland.
Lorenz Rischlabormedizinisches zentrum Dr Risch, Bern-Liebefeld, Switzerland.
Martin Rischlabormedizinisches zentrum Dr Risch, Schaan, Liechtenstein Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland.
Thomas Bodmerlabormedizinisches zentrum Dr Risch, Bern-Liebefeld, Switzerland thomas.bodmer@risch.ch.
Labormedizinische Zentrum Dr Risch (Switzerland) · CHPrivate University in the Principality of Liechtenstein · LIUniversity of Liechtenstein · LI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A total of 1,056 native or Cary-Blair-preserved stool specimens were simultaneously tested by conventional stool culturing and by enteric bacterial panel (EBP) multiplex real-time PCR for Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, Salmonella spp., and shigellosis disease-causing agents (Shigella spp. and enteroinvasive Escherichia coli [EIEC]). Overall, 143 (13.5%) specimens tested positive by PCR for the targets named above; 3 coinfections and 109 (10.4%) Campylobacter spp., 17 (1.6%) Salmonella spp., and 20 (1.9%) Shigella spp./EIEC infections were detected. The respective positive stool culture rates were 75 (7.1%), 14 (1.3%), and 7 (0.7%). The median threshold cycle (CT) values of culture-positive specimens were significantly lower than those of culture-negative ones (CT values, 24.3 versus 28.7; P < 0.001), indicating that the relative bacterial load per fecal specimen was significantly associated with the culture results. In Campylobacter infections, the respective median fecal calprotectin concentrations in PCR-negative/culture-negative (n = 40), PCR-positive/culture-negative (n = 14), and PCR-positive/culture-positive (n = 15) specimens were 134 mg/kg (interquartile range [IQR], 30 to 1,374 mg/kg), 1,913 mg/kg (IQR, 165 to 3,813 mg/kg), and 5,327 mg/kg (IQR, 1,836 to 18,213 mg/kg). Significant differences were observed among the three groups (P < 0.001), and a significant linear trend was identified (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the fecal calprotectin concentrations and CT values were found to be correlated (r = -0.658). Our results demonstrate that molecular screening of Campylobacter spp., Salmonella spp., and Shigella spp./EIEC using the BD Max EBP assay will result in timely diagnosis and improved sensitivity. The determination of inflammatory markers, such as calprotectin, in fecal specimens may aid in the interpretation of PCR results, particularly for enteric pathogens associated with mucosal damage and colonic inflammation.

Indexed as

Bacterial LoadBacteriaBacterial InfectionsDiarrheaFecesGastroenteritisHumansInflammationLeukocyte L1 Antigen ComplexMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityTime FactorsLeukocyte L1 Antigen Complex

Identifiers

PMID27307458
PMCPMC5005490
OpenAlexW2429069421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.