ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2017
Name Changes for Fungi of Medical Importance, 2012 to 2015.
Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- An Update on the Novel Genera and Species and Revised Taxonomic Status of Bacterial Organisms Described in 2016 and 2017.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019Pooled it
- Name Changes for Fungi of Medical Importance, 2016-2017.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2019Pooled it
- Name changes for fungi of medical importance, 2022-2024.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2025Review
- Antifungal Susceptibilities of Rare Yeast Isolates.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Changes in fungal taxonomy: mycological rationale and clinical implications.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2023Review
- Valid and accepted novel bacterial taxa derived from human clinical specimens and taxonomic revisions published in 2022.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2023Review
- Name Changes for Fungi of Medical Importance, 2020 to 2021.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2023Review
- Fungal Nomenclature: Managing Change is the Name of the Game.Open forum infectious diseases · 2023Review
- Name Changes for Fungi of Medical Importance, 2018 to 2019.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2021Review
- From the Clinical Mycology Laboratory: New Species and Changes in Fungal Taxonomy and Nomenclature.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Review
- Low Cryptococcus Antigen Titers as Determined by Lateral Flow Assay Should Be Interpreted Cautiously in Patients without Prior Diagnosis of Cryptococcal Infection.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2017Article
- A Rose by Any Other Name: Practical Updates on Microbial Nomenclature for Clinical Microbiology.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article lists proposed new or revised species names and classification changes associated with fungi of medical importance for the years 2012 through 2015. While many of the revised names listed have been widely adopted without further discussion, some may take longer to achieve more general usage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.