ArticleMolecular diagnosis & therapy2016
A Simple Method for TPMT and ITPA Genotyping Using Multiplex HRMA for Patients Treated with Thiopurine Drugs.
Article in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Precision medicine for rheumatologists: lessons from the pharmacogenomics of azathioprine.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Review
- Combining clinical and candidate gene data into a risk score for azathioprine-associated leukopenia in routine clinical practice.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2020Article
- Genetic polymorphisms of pharmacogenomic VIP variants in the Dai population from Yunnan province.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2020Article
- High-resolution melt analysis enables simple genotyping of complicated polymorphisms of codon 18 rendering the NUDT15 diplotype.Journal of gastroenterology · 2020Article
- ThiopurineTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2020Article
- Thiopurine S-methyltransferase activity in Nigerians: phenotypes and activity reference values.BMC research notes · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) and inosine triphosphatase (ITPA) are crucial enzymes involved in the metabolism of thiopurine drugs: azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine, used in the treatment of leukemia or inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The activity in these enzymes correlates with the genetic polymorphism of the TPMT and ITPA genes, respectively, which determines an individual reaction and dosing of thiopurines. Three main TPMT alleles: TPMT*2 (c.238G>C), TPMT*3A (c.460G>A, c.719A>G) and TPMT*3C (c.719A>G) account for 80-95 % of inherited TPMT deficiency in different populations in the world. In the ITPA gene, a c.94C>A mutation is significantly associated with an adverse thiopurine reaction. The aim of this study was to develop a quick and highly sensitive method for determining major TPMT and ITPA alleles. Here we present the molecular test for genotyping c.238G>C, c.460G>A, c.719A>G and c.94C>A changes based on multiplex high resolution melting analysis (HRMA). We analyzed DNA samples from 100 clinically diagnosed IBD patients treated with thiopurine drugs, and a known genotype in the positions 238, 460 and 719 of the TPMT gene as well as in position 94 of the ITPA gene. Our results obtained with multiplex HRMA indicated 100 % accuracy in comparison with data from restriction fragments length polymorphism (RFLP) and standard DNA sequencing. We conclude, that multiplex HRMA can be used as a quick, sensitive and efficient alternative diagnostic method compared to conventional techniques for the determination of TPMT*2, TPMT*3A and TPMT*3C alleles and c.94C>A change in the ITPA gene.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.