Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27307109›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

A rapid and practical technique for real-time monitoring of biomolecular interactions using mechanical responses of macromolecules.

Mehmet C Tarhan, Nicolas Lafitte, Yannick Tauran, Laurent Jalabert, Momoko Kumemura, Grégoire Perret, Beomjoon Kim, Anthony W Coleman, Hiroyuki Fujita, Dominique Collard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Mehmet C TarhanCIRMM, Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Nicolas LafitteLIMMS/CNRS-IIS, UMI 2820, Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Yannick TauranLIMMS/CNRS-IIS, UMI 2820, Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Laurent JalabertLIMMS/CNRS-IIS, UMI 2820, Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Momoko KumemuraCIRMM, Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Grégoire PerretLIMMS/CNRS-IIS, UMI 2820, Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Beomjoon KimCIRMM, Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Anthony W ColemanCIRMM, Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroyuki FujitaCIRMM, Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Dominique CollardCIRMM, Institute of Industrial Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring biological reactions using the mechanical response of macromolecules is an alternative approach to immunoassays for providing real-time information about the underlying molecular mechanisms. Although force spectroscopy techniques, e.g. AFM and optical tweezers, perform precise molecular measurements at the single molecule level, sophisticated operation prevent their intensive use for systematic biosensing. Exploiting the biomechanical assay concept, we used micro-electro mechanical systems (MEMS) to develop a rapid platform for monitoring bio/chemical interactions of bio macromolecules, e.g. DNA, using their mechanical properties. The MEMS device provided real-time monitoring of reaction dynamics without any surface or molecular modifications. A microfluidic device with a side opening was fabricated for the optimal performance of the MEMS device to operate at the air-liquid interface for performing bioassays in liquid while actuating/sensing in air. The minimal immersion of the MEMS device in the channel provided long-term measurement stability (>10 h). Importantly, the method allowed monitoring effects of multiple solutions on the same macromolecule bundle (demonstrated with DNA bundles) without compromising the reproducibility. We monitored two different types of effects on the mechanical responses of DNA bundles (stiffness and viscous losses) exposed to pH changes (2.1 to 4.8) and different Ag(+) concentrations (1 μM to 0.1 M).

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesDNAHumansMacromolecular SubstancesMicro-Electrical-Mechanical SystemsMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesDNAMacromolecular Substances

Identifiers

PMID27307109
PMCPMC4910067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.