ArticleEndocrine pathology2016
Sporadic Gastric Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumors Have a Higher Ki-67 Proliferative Index.
Article in Endocrine pathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Type 2 and type 3 gastric neuroendocrine tumors have high risk of lymph node metastasis: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2025Pooled it
- Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms type 1: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019Pooled it
- Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the stomach. Update on diagnostic criteria, classification, and prognostic markers.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2026Review
- Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumors (g-NETs): A Systematic Review of the Management and Outcomes of Type 3 g-NETs.Cancers · 2023Review
- An analysis of 130 neuroendocrine tumors G3 regarding prevalence, origin, metastasis, and diagnostic features.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2022Article
- Pathogenic ATM Variant-Harbouring Well-Differentiated Aggressive Type 1 Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumour with High-grade Features (G3 NET): a New Addition to the Clinical and Pathological Spectrum of Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Endocrine pathology · 2021Article
- Risk factors for lymph node metastasis in gastric neuroendocrine tumor: a retrospective study.BMC surgery · 2021Article
- Genomics of High-Grade Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumor with High-Grade Features (G3 NET) and Neuroendocrine Carcinomas (NEC) of Various Anatomic Sites.Endocrine pathology · 2021Review
- Clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of 77 cases with type 3 gastric neuroendocrine tumours.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020Article
- A Case of Gastric Neuroendocrine Neoplasm with Mixed Grade: a Distinct Type of "High"-grade Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Neoplasm.Endocrine pathology · 2018Article
- Clinicopathological features and prognosis of gastric mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (WDNET) of the stomach can arise in three distinct clinical settings: (1) in association with autoimmune atrophic gastritis, (2) in association with multiple neuroendocrine neoplasia type I (MEN I) or Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES), or (3) sporadic. The Ki-67 proliferative index (PI) in gastric WDNETs in these three distinct clinical settings has not been evaluated in detail. Forty-five gastric WNETs underwent polypectomy (n = 4), endoscopic mucosal resection (n = 12), and surgical resection (n = 29) between 1994 and 2015 were included. H&E slides from each case were reviewed, and Ki-67 immunostain was performed on one representative tumor block. Ki-67 PI was determined by quantitative Aperio image analysis software in areas of strongest nuclear labeling ("hot spots"), and correlated with underlying clinical and pathological features. Twenty-one patients were male and 24 female with a median age of 57 years (range, 30-80 years). Tumors were classified as type I (n = 17), type II (n = 6), and type III (n = 22) WDNETs. Types II and III showed more advanced TNM stage compared to type I (p = 0.02, overall). WHO grade based on Ki-67 PI was higher in type III WDNETs [grade 1 (G1), n = 3; grade 2 (G2), n = 15; and grade 3 (G3), n = 4] than in type I WDNETs [G1, n = 5; G2, n = 12] and in type II WDNETs [G1, n = 2; G2, n = 4] (p = 0.050, overall). Ki-67 PI was significantly higher in type III WDNETs (mean ± SD = 13.0 ± 13.3 %) than in non-sporadic (type I and II) WDNETs (mean ± SD = 5.3 ± 3.3 %; p = 0.015). There was no difference in Ki-67 PI between type I WDNETs (mean ± SD = 5.2 ± 3.5 %) and type II WDNETs (mean ± SD = 5.6 ± 3.1%; p = 0.817). Higher Ki-67 PI was associated with higher tumor T stage (p = 0.003) and also tended to be associated with lymph node metastasis (p = 0.071). In the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, type I was associated with a significantly longer disease-free survival (DFS) time compared to type II (p = 0.018) or III (0.010). Also, the WHO G3 group had a significantly shorter DFS time than the WHO G1 (p = 0.020) or G2 (p = 0.007) group. Gastric WDNET is a heterogeneous disease entity encompassing three clinical subtypes-type I, type II, and type III-having their own distinct clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis. Our results showed that sporadic (type III) WDNET had a significantly higher Ki-67 PI than non-sporadic cases (type I or II); increased PI was associated with higher tumor stage. We also described four type III cases of morphologically WD gastric NET with WHO grade 3 on the basis of Ki-67 PI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27306997What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.