ArticleExtremophiles : life under extreme conditions2016
Comparative analysis of prokaryotic diversity in solar salterns in eastern Anatolia (Turkey).
Article in Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unravelling Extremophilic Microbiome Diversity and Functional Dynamics in Hypersaline Environment.Microbial ecology · 2026Article
- Cultivation and characterization of haloarchaea from Moroccan Atlantic solar salterns: insights into diversity and bioactive potential.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2026Article
- Solar Salterns and Pollution: Valorization of Some Endemic Species as Sentinels in Ecotoxicology.Toxics · 2023Review
- Hypersaline Lake Urmia: a potential hotspot for microbial genomic variation.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Assessment of diversity of archaeal communities in Algerian chott.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2022Article
- Fungal Diversity and Composition of the Continental Solar Saltern in Añana Salt Valley (Spain).Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Diversity of actinobacteria in sediments of Qaidam Lake and Qinghai Lake, China.Archives of microbiology · 2021Article
- Distinctive distributions of halophilic Archaea across hypersaline environments within the Qaidam Basin of China.Archives of microbiology · 2021Article
- Article
- Geographical Isolation, Buried Depth, and Physicochemical Traits Drive the Variation of Species Diversity and Prokaryotic Community in Three Typical Hypersaline Environments.Microorganisms · 2020Article
- Transient Dynamics of Archaea and Bacteria in Sediments and Brine Across a Salinity Gradient in a Solar Saltern of Goa, India.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Metagenomic Insights Into the Diversity of Halophilic Microorganisms Indigenous to the Karak Salt Mine, Pakistan.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Robust Archaeal and Bacterial Communities Inhabit Shallow Subsurface Sediments of the Bonneville Salt Flats.mSphere · 2019Article
- NewFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Characterization of the Microbial Population Inhabiting a Solar Saltern Pond of the Odiel Marshlands (SW Spain).Marine drugs · 2018Article
- Changes in bacterial and archaeal communities during the concentration of brine at the graduation towers in Ciechocinek spa (Poland).Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2018Article
- Halorubrum salsamenti sp. nov., a Novel Halophilic Archaeon Isolated from a Brine of Salt Mine.Current microbiology · 2017Article
- Microbial diversity in the hypersaline Lake Meyghan, Iran.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Genome-Based Taxonomic Classification ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prokaryotic communities of four salterns (Bingöl, Fadlum, Kemah, and Tuzlagözü) in Turkey were examined and compared using the cultivation and cultivation-independent methods [fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and 454 pyrosequencing]. FISH analysis with universal probes revealed that feeding waters carried 1.6 × 10(2)-1.7 × 10(3) cells mL(-1), while crystallization ponds carried 3.8 × 10(6)-2.0 × 10(7) cells mL(-1) that were mostly haloarchaea, including square cells (except for Kemah). High-throughput 16S rRNA-based gene sequencing showed that the most frequent archaeal OTUs in Bingöl, Fadlum, Tuzlagözü, and Kemah samples were affiliated with Haloquadratum (76.8 %), Haloarcula (27.8 %), Halorubrum (49.6 %), and Halonotius (59.8 %), respectively. Bacteroidetes was the dominant bacterial phylum in Bingöl and Fadlum, representing 71.5 and 79.5 % of the bacterial OTUs (respectively), while the most abundant bacterial phylum found in the Kemah saltern was Proteobacteria (79.6 %). The majority of the bacterial OTUs recovered from Tuzlagözü belonged to the Cyanobacteria (35.7 %), Bacteroidetes (35.0 %), and Proteobacteria (25.5 %) phyla. Cultivation studies revealed that the archaeal isolates were closely related to the genera Halobacterium, Haloarcula, and Halorubrum. Bacterial isolates were confined to two phyla, Proteobacteria (Alphaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria classes) and Bacteroidetes. Comparative analysis showed that members of the Euryarchaeota, Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Cyanobacteria phyla were major inhabitants of the solar salterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27306996What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.