ArticleAcademic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges2016
Advancement of Women in the Biomedical Workforce: Insights for Success.
Article in Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A rapid realist review on leadership and career advancement interventions for women in healthcare.BMC health services research · 2024Review
- Accomplished women leaders in informatics: insights about successful careers.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- Assessing perceived effectiveness of career development efforts led by the women in American Medical Informatics Association Initiative.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Gender representation in U.S. biomedical informatics leadership and recognition.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
- Diversity and Political Leaning: Considerations for Epidemiology.American journal of epidemiology · 2020Article
- Expanding Opportunities for Professional Development: Utilization of Twitter by Early Career Women in Academic Medicine and Science.JMIR medical education · 2018Article
- Trends in MD/PhD Graduates Entering Psychiatry: Assessing the Physician-Scientist Pipeline.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Women continue to face unique barriers in the biomedical workforce that affect their advancement and retention in this field. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) formed the Working Group on Women in Biomedical Careers to address these issues. Through the efforts of the working group, the NIH funded 14 research grants to identify barriers or to develop and/or test interventions to support women in the biomedical workforce. The grantees that were funded through this endeavor later established the grassroots Research Partnership on Women in Biomedical Careers, and they continue to conduct research and disseminate information on the state of women in academic medicine. This Commentary explores the themes introduced in a collection of articles organized by the research partnership and published in this issue of Academic Medicine. The authors highlight the role that government plays in the advancement of women in academic medicine and highlight the findings put forward in this collection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.