ArticlePharmaceutical statistics2016
Hyperbaric oxygen brain injury treatment (HOBIT) trial: a multifactor design with response adaptive randomization and longitudinal modeling.
Article in Pharmaceutical statistics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02407028 (Hyperbaric Oxygen Brain Injury Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Hyperbaric Oxygen Brain Injury Treatment (HOBIT) Trial
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Inhalational Gases for Neuroprotection in Traumatic Brain Injury.Journal of neurotrauma · 2021Pooled it
- Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in the Treatment of Acute Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.Journal of neurotrauma · 2018Pooled it
- Disability Rating Scale in the First Few Weeks After a Severe Traumatic Brain Injury as a Predictor of 6-Month Functional Outcome.Neurosurgery · 2021Trial
- A Bayesian model with seasonal effects for predicting accrual in clinical trials: Application to HOBIT and BOOST-3 trials for severe traumatic brain injury.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2025Article
- Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Children with Brain Injury: A Retrospective Case Series.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Improved mortality analysis in early-phase dose-ranging clinical trials for emergency medical diseases using Bayesian time-to-event models with active comparators.Statistics in medicine · 2024Article
- Bayesian Sequential Design for Identifying and Ranking Effective Patient Subgroups in Precision Medicine in the Case of Counting Outcome Data with Inflated Zeros.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Management Strategies Based on Multi-Modality Neuromonitoring in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023Review
- Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research.The Lancet. Neurology · 2022Review
- Designing and analyzing clinical trials for personalized medicine via Bayesian models.Pharmaceutical statistics · 2021Article
- Bayesian accrual modeling and prediction in multicenter clinical trials with varying center activation times.Pharmaceutical statistics · 2020Article
- Two-stage Bayesian hierarchical modeling for blinded and unblinded safety monitoring in randomized clinical trials.BMC medical research methodology · 2020Article
- Bayesian hierarchical EMAX model for dose-response in early phase efficacy clinical trials.Statistics in medicine · 2019Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The goals of phase II clinical trials are to gain important information about the performance of novel treatments and decide whether to conduct a larger phase III trial. This can be complicated in cases when the phase II trial objective is to identify a novel treatment having several factors. Such multifactor treatment scenarios can be explored using fixed sample size trials. However, the alternative design could be response adaptive randomization with interim analyses and additionally, longitudinal modeling whereby more data could be used in the estimation process. This combined approach allows a quicker and more responsive adaptation to early estimates of later endpoints. Such alternative clinical trial designs are potentially more powerful, faster, and smaller than fixed randomized designs. Such designs are particularly challenging, however, because phase II trials tend to be smaller than subsequent confirmatory phase III trials. The phase II trial may need to explore a large number of treatment variations to ensure that the efficacy of optimal clinical conditions is not overlooked. Adaptive trial designs need to be carefully evaluated to understand how they will perform and to take full advantage of their potential benefits. This manuscript discusses a Bayesian response adaptive randomization design with a longitudinal model that uses a multifactor approach for predicting phase III study success via the phase II data. The approach is based on an actual clinical trial design for the hyperbaric oxygen brain injury treatment trial. Specific details of the thought process and the models informing the trial design are provided. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.