Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27306921›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutical statistics2016

Hyperbaric oxygen brain injury treatment (HOBIT) trial: a multifactor design with response adaptive randomization and longitudinal modeling.

Byron J Gajewski, Scott M Berry, William G Barsan, Robert Silbergleit, William J Meurer, Renee Martin, Gaylan L Rockswold

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutical statistics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02407028 (Hyperbaric Oxygen Brain Injury Treatment), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02407028 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Hyperbaric Oxygen Brain Injury Treatment (HOBIT) Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorGaylan RockswoldRan2018 to 2029Enrolled200ConditionsTraumatic Brain InjuryArmsHyperbaric oxygen (1.5 ATA, no NBH), Hyperbaric oxygen (2.0 ATA, no NBH), Hyperbaric oxygen (2.5 ATA, no NBH), Hyperbaric oxygen (1.5 ATA + NBH), Hyperbaric oxygen (2.0 ATA + NBH)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Management Strategies Based on Multi-Modality Neuromonitoring in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Medical journal, Armed Forces India
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Byron J GajewskiDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA. bgajewski@kumc.edu.
Scott M BerryDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
William G BarsanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann ArborMI, USA.
Robert SilbergleitDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann ArborMI, USA.
William J MeurerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann ArborMI, USA.
Renee MartinDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Gaylan L RockswoldHennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

Hyperbaric Oxygen Brain Injury Treatment (HOBIT) Trial - CCCU01NS095926 · NINDS · HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Byron J. Gajewski, Frederick Kofi Korley · 2017 to 2026
$12.3M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS095926
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goals of phase II clinical trials are to gain important information about the performance of novel treatments and decide whether to conduct a larger phase III trial. This can be complicated in cases when the phase II trial objective is to identify a novel treatment having several factors. Such multifactor treatment scenarios can be explored using fixed sample size trials. However, the alternative design could be response adaptive randomization with interim analyses and additionally, longitudinal modeling whereby more data could be used in the estimation process. This combined approach allows a quicker and more responsive adaptation to early estimates of later endpoints. Such alternative clinical trial designs are potentially more powerful, faster, and smaller than fixed randomized designs. Such designs are particularly challenging, however, because phase II trials tend to be smaller than subsequent confirmatory phase III trials. The phase II trial may need to explore a large number of treatment variations to ensure that the efficacy of optimal clinical conditions is not overlooked. Adaptive trial designs need to be carefully evaluated to understand how they will perform and to take full advantage of their potential benefits. This manuscript discusses a Bayesian response adaptive randomization design with a longitudinal model that uses a multifactor approach for predicting phase III study success via the phase II data. The approach is based on an actual clinical trial design for the hyperbaric oxygen brain injury treatment trial. Specific details of the thought process and the models informing the trial design are provided. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalBrain InjuriesCausalityClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicHumansHyperbaric OxygenationLongitudinal StudiesRandom AllocationBayesian adaptive designmultiple factorsphase II clinical trial

Identifiers

PMID27306921
PMCPMC13051609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.