Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27306795›Full record

SynthesisJournal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH2016

Association of thrombophilia and catheter-associated thrombosis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

S Neshat-Vahid, R Pierce, D Hersey, L J Raffini, E V S Faustino

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S Neshat-VahidDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
R PierceDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
D HerseyMedical Library, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
L J RaffiniDivision of Hematology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
E V S FaustinoDepartment of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA. vince.faustino@yale.edu.
Yale University · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · US

Funding

YALE PEDIATRIC BASIC SCIENCE TRAINING PROGRAMT32HD068201 · NICHD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI EGAN, MARIE E · 2011 to 2015
$1.3M
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD068201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledEssentials It is unclear if thrombophilia increases the risk of catheter-associated thrombosis in children. We conducted a meta-analysis on thrombophilia and pediatric catheter-associated thrombosis. Presence of ≥1 trait confers additional risk of venous thrombosis in children with catheters. Limitations of included studies preclude us from recommending routine thrombophilia testing. SUMMARY: Background The association between thrombophilia and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) associated with central venous catheter (CVC) use, the most important pediatric risk factor for thrombosis, is unclear in children. Pediatric studies with small sample sizes have reported conflicting results. We sought to evaluate whether, among children with CVCs, thrombophilia increases the risk of CVC-associated DVT (CADVT). Materials and methods We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials, PubMed and reference lists for controlled studies published from the inception of the database until September 2015. Included were studies of children aged <21 years with CVCs who were systematically tested for thrombophilic traits that are commonly screened for in clinical practice. Pooled prevalence rates and pooled odds ratios (pORs) of CADVT with thrombophilia were estimated by use of a random effects model. Results We analyzed 16 cohort studies with 1279 children, 277 of whom had CADVT, and with 12 traits tested. There was significant heterogeneity in the included studies. The presence of one or more traits was associated with CADVT (pOR 3.20; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.56-6.54). Although the prevalence of most traits was < 0.10, children with protein C deficiency, elevated factor VIII levels and the FV Leiden mutation had an increased prevalence of CADVT. The association with thrombophilia seemed to be stronger for symptomatic CADVT (pOR 6.71; 95% CI 1.93-23.37) than for asymptomatic CADVT (pOR 2.14; 95% CI 1.10-4.18). Conclusions On the basis of the low prevalence of specific traits, the relatively weak association with CADVT, and the limitations of the included studies, we cannot recommend routine testing of thrombophilias in children with CADVT.

Indexed as

AdolescentCatheterization, Central VenousCentral Venous CathetersChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleOdds RatioRetrospective StudiesThrombophiliaVenous ThrombosisYoung Adultcentral venous catheterfactor VIIIfactor V Leidenprotein C deficiencyvenous thromboembolism

Identifiers

PMID27306795
PMCPMC5035642
OpenAlexW2420666807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.