Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27306732›Full record

Trial reportDrug and alcohol dependence2016

Improving substance use prevention efforts with executive function training.

Mary Ann Pentz, Nathaniel R Riggs, Christopher M Warren

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mary Ann PentzThe Institute for Health Promotion & Disease Prevention Research (IPR), Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90032 USA. Electronic address: pentz@usc.edu.
Nathaniel R RiggsDepartment of Human Development and Family Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1570, USA.
Christopher M WarrenThe Institute for Health Promotion & Disease Prevention Research (IPR), Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90032 USA.
University of Southern California · USColorado State University · US

Funding

USC Tobacco Center of Regulatory Science (TCORS) for Vulnerable PopulationsP50CA180905 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI PENTZ, MARY ANN, SAMET, JONATHAN M · 2013 to 2017
$20.1M
Translational Research: Applying Drug Prevention to Obesity PreventionR01HD052107 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI PENTZ, MARY ANN · 2007 to 2011
$3.9M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA180905NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD052107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExecutive function (EF) includes emotional regulation, planning and decision-making, and behavioral impulse control. Improving youth substance use (SU) prevention by targeting EF poses challenges including determining whether specific sub-domains of EF are more associated with SU than others, whether EF is related to some types of SU more than others, and whether EF programs might be enhanced by inclusion of mindfulness training.

methodsData were drawn from two studies from the Pathways to Health project: a randomized controlled trial of 4th-6th graders and a cross-sectional pilot study of the relationship of EF to specific types of SU in a sample of 7th graders. Survey measures included assessment of the EF subdomains of inhibitory control (IC), emotional control, working memory, organization/planning, lifetime SU (tobacco and alcohol use), and mindfulness. Analyses included multivariate and multiple group path analysis.

resultsResults suggested that the EF sub-domain of IC was the strongest and most consistent predictor of SU, particularly cigarette and e-cigarette use, though emotional control was predictive of alcohol use among late-elementary school students. In the 7th grade sample, IC was predictive of alcohol, cigarette, and e-cigarette use only among students in the low 75% of mindfulness.

conclusionsFindings from the present studies suggest that improvements in SU prevention efforts may result from increased curricular emphasis on IC and its application to multiple substance use prevention, and systematically integrating mindfulness with EF skills training. Future research should examine whether EF-SU relationships vary across patterns of SU and types of measures used to assess EF.

Indexed as

Executive FunctionAdolescentAlcohol DrinkingChildCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleHumansMaleMindfulnessPilot ProjectsStudentsSubstance-Related DisordersSurveys and QuestionnairesAdolescentDrug abuse preventionEmotional regulationExecutive functionImpulse controlInhibitory controlMindfulness

Identifiers

PMID27306732
PMCPMC12341295
OpenAlexW2428946455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.