Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27306625›Full record

Observational studyNeurology2016

Improved in-hospital outcomes and care for patients in stroke research: An observational study.

Tara Purvis, Kelvin Hill, Monique Kilkenny, Nadine Andrew, Dominique Cadilhac

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tara PurvisFrom Stroke and Ageing Research (T.P., M.K., N.A., D.C.), School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University; Stroke Division (T.P., M.K., D.C.), Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health; and National Stroke Foundation (K.H.), Melbourne, Australia. tara.purvis@monash.edu.
Kelvin HillFrom Stroke and Ageing Research (T.P., M.K., N.A., D.C.), School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University; Stroke Division (T.P., M.K., D.C.), Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health; and National Stroke Foundation (K.H.), Melbourne, Australia.
Monique KilkennyFrom Stroke and Ageing Research (T.P., M.K., N.A., D.C.), School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University; Stroke Division (T.P., M.K., D.C.), Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health; and National Stroke Foundation (K.H.), Melbourne, Australia.
Nadine AndrewFrom Stroke and Ageing Research (T.P., M.K., N.A., D.C.), School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University; Stroke Division (T.P., M.K., D.C.), Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health; and National Stroke Foundation (K.H.), Melbourne, Australia.
Dominique CadilhacFrom Stroke and Ageing Research (T.P., M.K., N.A., D.C.), School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University; Stroke Division (T.P., M.K., D.C.), Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health; and National Stroke Foundation (K.H.), Melbourne, Australia.
National Stroke Foundation · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe stroke research activity in Australian acute public hospitals and determine if participation in research provides better quality of care and outcomes for patients with stroke.

methodsThis was an observational study using data from hospitals that participated in the National Stroke Foundation (Australia) acute services audit program in 2009, 2011, and 2013. This included self-reported organizational features and a retrospective clinical audit of up to 40 medical records of patients with stroke from each hospital. Multilevel random effects logistic regression with level defined as hospital and adjustments for hospital, demographic, clinical, and stroke severity factors were undertaken.

resultsA total of 240 hospitals submitted organizational data. Hospitals with a stroke unit (70% vs 7%, p < 0.001) and >200 stroke admissions per year (80% vs 17%, p < 0.001) reported greater involvement in research studies. Of 9,537 patients audited at 129 hospitals, 469 (5%) consented to participate in research. Patients who participated in research compared to nonparticipants were likely to be younger (median age 73 years; 25th percentile [Q1]: 63, 75th percentile [Q3]: 80, vs median age 76 years Q1: 64, Q3: 83; p < 0.001) and receive important clinical practices such as a swallow screen/assessment prior to oral intake (62% vs 56%; p < 0.01). An independent association with reduced in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.30, 95% confidence interval 0.12, 0.76) was evident if participating in research regardless of access to stroke unit care.

conclusionsPatients who participate in stroke research receive better in-hospital care and are more likely to survive compared to nonresearch participants. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that patients with stroke who participate in research receive better quality of care and have reduced in-hospital mortality.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchHospitalizationAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleMedical AuditMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSelf ReportStrokeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID27306625
PMCPMC4940070
OpenAlexW2430827478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.