Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27306548›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2017

Sharp and round shapes of seen objects have distinct influences on vowel and consonant articulation.

L Vainio, M Tiainen, K Tiippana, A Rantala, M Vainio

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Sound-Action Symbolism.Frontiers in psychology · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Five mechanisms of sound symbolic association.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2018
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

L VainioInstitute of Behavioural Sciences, Division of Cognitive and Neuropsychology, University of Helsinki, Siltavuorenpenger 5 A, Helsinki PL 9, 00014, Helsinki, Finland. lari.vainio@helsinki.fi.
M TiainenInstitute of Behavioural Sciences, Division of Cognitive and Neuropsychology, University of Helsinki, Siltavuorenpenger 5 A, Helsinki PL 9, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
K TiippanaInstitute of Behavioural Sciences, Division of Cognitive and Neuropsychology, University of Helsinki, Siltavuorenpenger 5 A, Helsinki PL 9, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
A RantalaInstitute of Behavioural Sciences, Division of Cognitive and Neuropsychology, University of Helsinki, Siltavuorenpenger 5 A, Helsinki PL 9, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.
M VainioInstitute of Behavioural Sciences, Phonetics and Speech Synthesis Research Group, University of Helsinki, Siltavuorenpenger 5 A, Helsinki PL 9, 00014, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The shape and size-related sound symbolism phenomena assume that, for example, the vowel [i] and the consonant [t] are associated with sharp-shaped and small-sized objects, whereas [ɑ] and [m] are associated with round and large objects. It has been proposed that these phenomena are mostly based on the involvement of articulatory processes in representing shape and size properties of objects. For example, [i] might be associated with sharp and small objects, because it is produced by a specific front-close shape of articulators. Nevertheless, very little work has examined whether these object properties indeed have impact on speech sound vocalization. In the present study, the participants were presented with a sharp- or round-shaped object in a small or large size. They were required to pronounce one out of two meaningless speech units (e.g., [i] or [ɑ]) according to the size or shape of the object. We investigated how a task-irrelevant object property (e.g., the shape when responses are made according to size) influences reaction times, accuracy, intensity, fundamental frequency, and formant 1 and formant 2 of vocalizations. The size did not influence vocal responses but shape did. Specifically, the vowel [i] and consonant [t] were vocalized relatively rapidly when the object was sharp-shaped, whereas [u] and [m] were vocalized relatively rapidly when the object was round-shaped. The study supports the view that the shape-related sound symbolism phenomena might reflect mapping of the perceived shape with the corresponding articulatory gestures.

Indexed as

SymbolismAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpace PerceptionSpeech Perception

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.